TMBR: September 2026

From BusyBeaverWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Prev: August 2026 This Month in Beaver Research Next: October 2026

This edition of TMBR is in progress and has not yet been released. Please add any notes you think may be relevant (including in the form a of a TODO with a link to any relevant Discord discussion).

Blog Posts

Champions

  • On September 1, nickdrozd discovered a new BLB(3,3) champion which runs for over 10↑↑6.54 steps before blanking the tape.[1] Note that this is not a new BBB(3,3) champion.
  • On September 9, @-d discovered a new BBf(24) champion which runs for over 9.000 × 1014,448 steps.[2]

BB Adjacent

  • Cyclic Tag
    • On September 1, Azerty enumerated all BBCT programs up to size 14, proving the values of BBCT(n) for n < 7.[3]
    • On September 2, sheep discovered new champions for BBCT(11),[4] BBCT(13),[5] and BBCT(14).[6]
    • On September 5, Azerty proved BBCT(7) = 13.[7]
  • Cellular Automata Busy Beaver
    • On September 1, Azerty introduced an extension to mxdys's BB1dCA(n) function, called BBCA(n),[8] and discovered a champion for BBCA(3).[9]
    • On September 2, Azerty discovered champions for BBCA(2), BBCA(3), BBCA(4), BBCA(2,3), and BBCA(2,4).[10]
    • On September 20, Azerty discovered new champions for BBCA(4), BBCA(3,3), and BBCA(2,4), and proved BBCA(2,3) = 4.[11]
  • General Recursive Function
    • On September 5, after Shawn Ligocki renewed interest in a certain chaotic BBµ(16) holdout last month, sheep devised a method to accelerate the simulation of the holdout.[12] This allowed her to confirm that, if the holdout returned a value, it would be larger than 3.124 × 1016.[13]
    • On September 7, the aforementioned method was ported to Rust by @ZTS439, allowing them to extend the bound to 4.999 × 1017.[14]
  • PLUSMINUS[15]
    • On September 8, @Jack introduced PLUSMINUS, a new esoteric language.[16] Though its completeness is unknown, this language is not expected to be Turing-complete.[17]
    • On September 9, @mathmasterzach discovered champion PLUSMINUS strings for sizes 9,[18] 11,[19] 12,[20], 15, and 16.[21]
    • On the same day, @Furious discovered champion PLUSMINUS strings for sizes 1 to 8[22] and size 10-14.[23]
    • On the same day, racheline provided an estimate for the halting times of PLUSMINUS programs.[24] This suggests that PLUSMINUS is not Turing-complete.
    • On September 10, @Furious converted the rules of PLUSMINUS into a piecewise mathematical function.[25]
    • On September 11, @Jack discovered champion PLUSMINUS strings for sizes 20, 23, 32, 36, and 40.[26]
  • Post Tag System (alternate definition)
    • On September 12, Azerty introduced an alternate formulation of the Busy Beaver function for Post Tag Systems, where a system in the BBPT*(m, n) domain may continue running even if it reduces to less than m symbols;[27] in this formulation, the BBPT(11) Cryptid 11111_20_1 is non-halting.[28]
    • On September 16, Azerty enumerated all 2-tag systems with size less than or equal to 9[29], and proved the values of BBPT*(n) for sizes 1 to 5.
    • On the same day, sheep discovered a new BBPT*(9) champion.[30]
    • On September 30, sheep discovered a 2-tag size 11 Cryptid, showing BBPT*(11) is hard;[31] Azerty expects there to be smaller Cryptids,[32] likely referring to systems with their tape length history similar to a biased random walk.
  • Fractran
    • On September 13, @-d completed enumeration of BBf(24), leaving an initial 6,733,785 holdouts, which were reduced to 231,432 holdouts, or 10,838 holdouts if ai-created deciders are used.[33]
  • Ordered Rewrite System
    • On September 16, @andrewthebonfire and Azerty introduced the Busy Beaver function on Ordered rewrite systems,[34][35][36] with Azerty later finding BBOR(n) champions for sizes 1 to 8, and proving the values of BBOR(n) for sizes 1 to 4.[37]
    • On September 17, @andrewthebonfire provided a method to convert Turing machines into ordered rewrite systems.[38] He also showed that ordered rewrite systems with a binary alphabet (i.e. two symbols) are still Turing-complete.[39]
    • On September 30, sheep discovered a size 17 Cryptid, showing BBOR(17) is hard.[40]
  • Register Machine
    • On September 18, @mineralli discovered a new MBB(9) champion.[41] sheep then discovered four new champions for MBB(9) in the four following days.[42][43][44][45]
    • On the same day, @elgan65536 discovered a new MBB(8,2) champion.[46]
    • On September 23, sheep discovered champions for MBB(11)[47] and MBB(12).[48]
    • On September 25, sheep discovered an MBB(10) champion,[49] which was shown to halt in around 102,629,437 steps by Shawn Ligocki.[50] This champion prompted a rework of Ligocki's hydra-like rule accelerator.[51]
    • On September 29, @mineralli discovered a 5-register, 19-state machine which halts iff the Erdős ternary conjecture is false.
    • On the same day, sheep discovered a 7-register, 28-state machine beating Graham's number.[52]
    • On September 30, @mineralli discovered a new MBB(11,2) champion,[53] improved upon by sheep.[54]
  • Pebble Eating
    • On September 30, sheep discovered an 86 pebble Cryptid, showing peBBle(86) is hard.[55]

Holdouts

  • BB(6)
    • By September 4, mxdys solved all 16 Counter Class 1 TMs.[56]
    • On September 4, Discord user fifi_49513 claimed to have proven a TM non-halting. [57] This machine was later confirmed non-halting in Rocq on September 5 by mxdys. [58]
    • On September 8, mxdys released a new holdouts list of 964 machines up to equivalence.[59]
    • On September 14, an independent computation by Seiji extended the Space Needle trajectory to 100,000,000 terms: no power of 2 was ever encountered, and the most factors of 2 any term had was 25 (first occurring at n = 23,145,881; the previously documented state was >17,000,000 terms with max 24). The full final value (94,125,050 bits) is published with SHA-256 anchors, together with 400 checkpoints cross-verified by two independent implementations, and exact macro step-count laws of the machine (L0–L4; L1 and L3 formally proven). [60]
    • On September 16, mxdys released another holdouts list of 855 machines up to equivalence.[61]
    • On September 24, mxdys released another holdouts list of 815 machines up to equivalence.[62] The newly solved holdouts include:
      • BMO9
      • Two shift-overflow bell counters
      • 31 shift-overflow mixed-digits counters with similar behavior
      • two new translated cyclers (also shift-overflow mixed-digits counters) with high period
      • two other shift-overflow counters
    • On September 24, Discord user q64 simulated a TM to halting.[63]
    • The halting status of 1RB1LA_1RC1RE_1LD0RB_1LA0LC_0RF0RD_0RB--- (bbch) was formalized without new axioms by avoiding the use of Baker–Wüstholz theorem.
    • On September 30, mxdys released another holdouts list of 797 machines up to equivalence.[64]
  • BB(2,5)
    • On September 8, mxdys released a new holdouts list of 60 machines.[65]
    • On September 25 and 26, prurq claimed to have used Aristotle AI and GPT6 to solve 21 of the 60 remaining holdouts.[66][67]
  • BB(2,7)
    • Terry Ligocki enumerated 30K more subtasks, increasing the number of holdouts to 3,062,427,379. A total of 980K subtasks out of the 1 million subtasks (or 98%) have been enumerated.

Misc

  • On September 2, RobinCodes began work on updating the BB(6) holdout spreadsheet.[67]
  • On September 5, XnoobSpeakable began an opt-in archival project of the bbchallenge Discord server.[68]
  • On September 23, Joseph M. Shunia published a preprint presenting a 120-state, 2-symbol TM that halts iff Riemann hypothesis is false.[69]
  • On September 22, Twitter user @_Mira___Mira_, claimed to have used GPT-6 Astra to discover a 387-state, 2-symbol TM whose halting status is independent of ZFC.[70]
    • On September 24, they claimed to have reduced this to a 314-state ZFC-independent TM, and claimed to have found a 289-state, 2-symbol PA-independent TM.[71]
    • On September 30, they claimed to have reduced these to a 256-state ZFC-independent TM , and a 238-state PA-independent TM, after a series of improvements. A Metamath formalization is in progress.[72]
  • On September 28, Twitter user @_Mira___Mira_ discovered a fractal related to the Antihydra conjecture.[73]