Beaver Math Olympiad: Difference between revisions
m (not stub) |
(add solution for bonnie problem) |
||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
With these two rules alone, Bonnie calculates the first few terms in the sequence: <math>2, 0, 3, 6, 11, 18, 39, 78, 155, 306, \dots</math>. At this point, Bonnie plans to continue writing terms until a term becomes <math>1\text{ (mod 3)}</math>. If Bonnie sticks to her plan, will she ever finish? | With these two rules alone, Bonnie calculates the first few terms in the sequence: <math>2, 0, 3, 6, 11, 18, 39, 78, 155, 306, \dots</math>. At this point, Bonnie plans to continue writing terms until a term becomes <math>1\text{ (mod 3)}</math>. If Bonnie sticks to her plan, will she ever finish? | ||
<div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed">'''Solution'''<div class="mw-collapsible-content"> | |||
How to guess the closed-form solution: Firstly, notice that <math>a_n \approx \frac{3}{5} \times 2^n</math>. Secondly, calculate the error term <math>a_n - \frac{3}{5} \times 2^n</math>. The error term appears to have a period of 4. This leads to the following guess: | |||
<math display="block">a_n=\frac{3}{5}\begin{cases} | |||
2^n+\frac{7}{3} &\text{if } n\equiv 0 \pmod{4}\\ | |||
2^n-2 &\text{if } n\equiv 1 \pmod{4}\\ | |||
2^n+1 &\text{if } n\equiv 2 \pmod{4}\\ | |||
2^n+2 &\text{if } n\equiv 3 \pmod{4}\\ | |||
\end{cases}</math> | |||
This closed-form solution can be proven correct by induction. Unfortunately, the induction may require a lot of tedious calculations. | |||
In all 4 cases, we have <math>a_n \equiv 0\text{ (mod 3)}</math> or <math>a_n \equiv 2\text{ (mod 3)}</math>. Therefore, Bonnie will never finish. | |||
</div></div> |
Revision as of 07:27, 24 July 2024
Beaver Mathematical Olympiad (BMO) is an attempt to re-formulate the halting problem for some particular Turing machines as a mathematical problem in a style suitable for a hypothetical math olympiad.
The purpose of the BMO is twofold. First, statements where every non-essential details (e.g. related to tape encoding, number of steps, etc) are discarded are more suitable to be shared with mathematicians who perhaps are able to help. Second, it's a way to jokingly highlight how a hard question could appear deceptively simple.
Unsolved problems
1RB1RE_1LC0RA_0RD1LB_---1RC_1LF1RE_0LB0LE
Let and be two sequences such that and
for all positive integers . Does there exist a positive integer such that ?
Hydra and Antihydra
Let be a sequence such that for all non-negative integers .
- If , does there exist a non-negative integer such that the list of numbers have more than twice as many even numbers as odd numbers? (Hydra)
- If , does there exist a non-negative integer such that the list of numbers have more than twice as many odd numbers as even numbers? (Antihydra)
Solved problems
1RB0RB3LA4LA2RA_2LB3RA---3RA4RB
(bbch) and 1RB1RB3LA4LA2RA_2LB3RA---3RA4RB
(bbch)
Let be the largest integer such that divides . Let be a sequence such that
for all non-negative integers . Is there an integer such that for some positive integer ?
Link to Discord discussion: https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1084047886494470185/1252634913220591728
1RB3RB---1LB0LA_2LA4RA3LA4RB1LB
(bbch)
Bonnie the beaver was bored, so she tried to construct a sequence of integers . She first defined , then defined depending on and using the following rules:
- If , then .
- If , then .
With these two rules alone, Bonnie calculates the first few terms in the sequence: . At this point, Bonnie plans to continue writing terms until a term becomes . If Bonnie sticks to her plan, will she ever finish?
How to guess the closed-form solution: Firstly, notice that . Secondly, calculate the error term . The error term appears to have a period of 4. This leads to the following guess:
This closed-form solution can be proven correct by induction. Unfortunately, the induction may require a lot of tedious calculations.
In all 4 cases, we have or . Therefore, Bonnie will never finish.