TMBR: October 2025: Difference between revisions

From BusyBeaverWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
RobinCodes (talk | contribs)
m More todo.
RobinCodes (talk | contribs)
Holdouts: Added mxdys progress on BB6 (10/50 random holdouts solved)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 14: Line 14:


* 22 Oct 2025. Ben Brubaker. [https://benbrubaker.com/why-busy-beaver-hunters-fear-the-antihydra/ Why Busy Beaver Hunters Fear the Antihydra].
* 22 Oct 2025. Ben Brubaker. [https://benbrubaker.com/why-busy-beaver-hunters-fear-the-antihydra/ Why Busy Beaver Hunters Fear the Antihydra].
* ? Oct 2025. Katelyn Doucette. [https://katelyndoucette.com/articles/building-the-busy-beaver-ladder Building the Busy Beaver Ladder].


== Champions ==
== Champions ==
Line 65: Line 64:
** @Bricks [https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1239205785913790465/1430227817957953638 shared a machine] which they thought could be susceptible to [[Block Analysis|block-analysis]] based on a [[TMBR: October 2025#Misc|method they call Subtape Saturation Heuristic.]] [[1RB1RF 0LC1RC 1RD1LC ---0RE 1RA1LF 1RA0LE|Shawn Ligocki's analysis]], simulated by @Bricks showed the machine to halt with a sigma score of 4,419,340,317.
** @Bricks [https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1239205785913790465/1430227817957953638 shared a machine] which they thought could be susceptible to [[Block Analysis|block-analysis]] based on a [[TMBR: October 2025#Misc|method they call Subtape Saturation Heuristic.]] [[1RB1RF 0LC1RC 1RD1LC ---0RE 1RA1LF 1RA0LE|Shawn Ligocki's analysis]], simulated by @Bricks showed the machine to halt with a sigma score of 4,419,340,317.
** [https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1239205785913790465/1431225455557611611 Analysis by Racheline] showed a machine to be non-halting.
** [https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1239205785913790465/1431225455557611611 Analysis by Racheline] showed a machine to be non-halting.
** [https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1400456788955893840/1433455522715009135 mxdys decided a machine] from the [[TMBR: August 2025#Misc|50 Random Holdouts]] introduced back in August, making 10/50 solved.
* [[BB(7)|BB(7):]]
* [[BB(7)|BB(7):]]
** Andrew Ducharme has continued reducing the [[BB(7)#Phase 2|number of holdouts]] with Stage 4 of Phase 2. Afterwards, Terry Ligocki ran Stage 5 of Phase 2. Initially, in the beginning of the month there were 22,801,601 holdouts, and 20,405,295 holdouts remain. (10.51% reduction)
** Andrew Ducharme has continued reducing the [[BB(7)#Phase 2|number of holdouts]] with Stage 4 of Phase 2. Afterwards, Terry Ligocki ran Stage 5 of Phase 2. Initially, in the beginning of the month there were 22,801,601 holdouts, and 20,405,295 holdouts remain. (10.51% reduction)
Line 86: Line 86:


== Deciders ==
== Deciders ==
TODO: Add -d's cpp quick_sim project. Discord source: https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1226543091264126976/1426265937455222794


TODO: Add Katelyn's inductive project. Discord source:https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1369339127652159509/1419016459560161280 https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1095740122139480195/1427714010697961534
* Inductive deciders
** -d rewrote quick_sim.py in C++, achieving a 6-10x faster runtime<sup>[https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1226543091264126976/1432118726492291173 1][https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1226543091264126976/1433247936942440498 2]</sup>.
** Katelyn Douchette is working on an automated inductive decider<sup>[https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1369339127652159509/1419016459560161280 1][https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1095740122139480195/1427714010697961534 2].</sup> (see [[Inductive Proof System|inductive proofs]])
 
[[Category:This Month in Beaver Research|2025-10]]
[[Category:This Month in Beaver Research|2025-10]]

Latest revision as of 14:27, 30 October 2025

Prev: September 2025 This Month in Beaver Research Next: November 2025

This edition of TMBR is in progress and has not yet been released. Please add any notes you think may be relevant (including in the form a of a TODO with a link to any relevant Discord discussion).

TODO: BB(3x3) month

TODO: BB(2x5) month next month (?)

A brave busy beaver confronts the dreaded Antihydra. Copyright Nico Roper.

Misc

TODO: Add the mechanical Turing Machine. discord source: https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1362008236118511758/1425889021653160026 and onwards

TODO: Add the method used by @Bricks to measure susceptibility to block-analysis. discord source: https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1239205785913790465/1430227817957953638 also results: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1j00LBxxp9W7uz1wZdMIvDCZ56eReuH0IGO9Z8-yybcQ/edit?usp=sharing

Wily Coyote, a BB(3,3) holdout

Blog Posts

Champions

Holdouts

BB(6) Holdouts count decrease overtime.
BB(6) Holdouts count decrease overtime.
BB Holdout Reduction by Domain
Domain New Holdout Count Previous Holdout Count Holdout Reduction % Reduction
BB(6) 1618 1691 73 4.3%
BB(7) 20,405,295 22,801,601 2,396,306 10.5%
BB(4,3) 9,401,447 460,916,384 451,514,937 98.0%
BB(3,4) 15,136,283 434,787,751 419,651,468 96.6%
BB(2,6) 870,085 873,469 3384 0.4%

Theory

Piecewise Affine Functions (PAF) were explored as a generalization of the BMO1 rules:

  • @Bard proved that 3 dimension PAF are Turing complete: [1]
  • @star proved that 2 dimension PAF are Turing complete: [2]
  • Shawn Ligocki wrote up a proof sketch that 2-region PAF are Turing complete: [3]
  • It was discovered that Amir Ben-Amram had already proven that 2-dim and 2-region PAF were Turing complete in 2015.
  • BMO1 is a 2-dim, 2-region PAF so this provides some sense for the difficulty of the problem.

Deciders

  • Inductive deciders
    • -d rewrote quick_sim.py in C++, achieving a 6-10x faster runtime12.
    • Katelyn Douchette is working on an automated inductive decider12. (see inductive proofs)