Talk:Busy Beaver Frontier: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Jacobzheng (talk | contribs) Add a few more guesses |
Tag: Undo |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
I think the first Busy Beaver function values that exceed the largest numbers ever constructed by humans using computable methods are BB(14), BB(8,3), BB(6,4), BB(5,5), BB(4,6), BB(3,8), and BB(2,13). | I think the first Busy Beaver function values that exceed the largest numbers ever constructed by humans using computable methods are BB(14), BB(8,3), BB(6,4), BB(5,5), BB(4,6), BB(3,8), and BB(2,13). | ||
I think BB(6) won't exceed <math>f_\omega( | I think BB(6) won't exceed <math>f_\omega(1000)</math>, BB(3,3) won't exceed <math>10^{1000}</math>, and BB(2,5) won't exceed <math>10\uparrow\uparrow 1000</math>. | ||
[[User:Jacobzheng|Jacobzheng]] ([[User talk:Jacobzheng|talk]]) 15:24, 13 October 2026 (UTC) | [[User:Jacobzheng|Jacobzheng]] ([[User talk:Jacobzheng|talk]]) 15:24, 13 October 2026 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 07:55, 14 October 2026
I'm adding a few more guesses:
I think the first busy beaver function values that exceed Graham's number are BB(7), BB(4,3), BB(3,4), and BB(2,6).
I think the first Busy Beaver function values that exceed the largest numbers ever constructed by humans using computable methods are BB(14), BB(8,3), BB(6,4), BB(5,5), BB(4,6), BB(3,8), and BB(2,13).
I think BB(6) won't exceed , BB(3,3) won't exceed , and BB(2,5) won't exceed .
Jacobzheng (talk) 15:24, 13 October 2026 (UTC)