Hydra function

From BusyBeaverWiki
Revision as of 12:00, 7 March 2025 by MrSolis (talk | contribs) (Replaced bitmap with spiral image, added material to the Properties section)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
A spiral-like figure that gives the first few terms of the Hydra sequences with initial values 2, 5, 8, 11, and 17.

The Hydra function is a Collatz-like function defined as: H(n)n+12n=32n={3n2if n0(mod2),3n12if n1(mod2). It is named as such due its connection to the unsolved halting problems for the Cryptids Hydra and Antihydra. Due to its simplicity, simulations for both of these Turing machines utilize this function instead of what can initially be proven.

Relationship to Hydra and Antihydra

Using the Hydra function, we can obtain simplified rules for Hydra and Antihydra:

Hydra Antihydra
Let CH(a,b):=0<A203(a2)3b20:0A>020CH(3,0),CH(2a,0)54a248a2039a81A>20,CH(2a,b+1)54a239a5CH(3a,b),CH(2a+1,b)4b+54a23a+4CH(3a+1,b+2). Let AH(a,b):=01a01b4E>0:0A>011AH(0,8),AH(a,2b)2a+3b21AH(a+2,3b),AH(0,2b+1)3b23b70<F11013b60,AH(a+1,2b+1)3b27AH(a,3b+1).
Proof

Recall the high-level rules for Hydra and Antihydra:

Hydra Antihydra
Let C(a,b):=0<A20a3b20:0A>020C(3,0),C(2a,0)6a2+20a+4033a+11A>20,C(2a,b+1)6a2+23a+10C(3a+3,b),C(2a+1,b)4b+6a2+23a+26C(3a+3,b+2). Let A(a,b):=01a01bE>0:0A>011A(0,4),A(a,2b)2a+3b2+12b+11A(a+2,3b+2),A(0,2b+1)3b2+9b10<F11013b0,A(a+1,2b+1)3b2+12b+5A(a,3b+3).

Already, both machines appear to have very similar functions. They have one parameter that increases exponentially with growth factor 32 and another that effectively takes a pseudo-random walk. Below, the exponentially increasing variables are described by integer sequences:

Hydra Antihydra
a0=3,an+1={3an+62if an0(mod2)3an+32if an1(mod2) a0=4,an+1={3an+42if an0(mod2)3an+32if an1(mod2)

This makes illustrating the transformation easier. Now we will define a new integer sequence based on the old one and discover the recursive rules for that sequence. This new sequence is bn=13an+2 and bn=an+4 for Hydra and Antihydra respectively. We start by using bn+1 instead and substituting an+1 for its recursive formula. By doing so, we get:

Hydra Antihydra
b0=3,bn+1={an+62if an0(mod2)an+52if an1(mod2) b0=8,bn+1={3an+122if an0(mod2)3an+112if an1(mod2)

After that, we can substitute an for its solution in terms of bn. What results is the following:

Hydra Antihydra
b0=3,bn+1={3(bn2)+62if 3(bn2)0(mod2)3(bn2)+52if 3(bn2)1(mod2) b0=8,bn+1={3(bn4)+122if bn40(mod2)3(bn4)+112if bn41(mod2)

We note that the if statements simplify to checking if bn is even or odd. After simplifying, we are done:

Hydra Antihydra
b0=3,bn+1={3bn2if bn0(mod2)3bn12if bn1(mod2) b0=8,bn+1={3bn2if bn0(mod2)3bn12if bn1(mod2)

Now that we have demonstrated a strong similarity in the behaviour of both Turing machines, we can return to using the high-level rules. Doing that while accounting for the step counts yields the final result.

Properties

The Hydra function can be rewritten as follows: H(2n)=3n,H(2n+1)=3n+1. Now we will define s and t to be positive integers with t additionally being odd, and substitute n2s1t: H(2st)=2s1×3t,H(2st+1)=2s1×3t+1. Because 2s1×3t is also the result of substituting ss1 and t3t, we can iterate the Hydra function many times. Letting Hk(n)=H((H(H(n))))k times, this means: Hs(2st)=3st,Hs(2st+1)=3st+1. This optimization can be directly applied to the high-level rules for Hydra and Antihydra, producing this result:

Hydra Antihydra
Let CH(a,b):=0<A203(a2)3b20:

CH(2st,b+s)f1(s,t)CH(3st,b),CH(2st+1,b)f2(s,t,b)CH(3st+1,b+2s), where f1(s,t)=6t(3s2s)(36(3s+2s)t65)55s and f2(s,t,b)=6t(3s2s)(36(3s+2s)t+175)5+(4b+4s+51)s.

Let AH(a,b):=01a01b4E>0:AH(a,2st)f3(s,t,a)AH(a+2s,3st),AH(a+s,2st+1)f4(s,t)AH(a,3st+1),

where f3(s,t,a)=12t2(9s4s)5+(2a3+2s)s and f4(s,t)=12t(3s2s)((3s+2s)t+5)54s.