TMBR: August 2026: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
added wow |
not messy but ugly |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
** On August 2, @-d noticed that holdout #601 iterates a chaotic map, possibly meaning it has no stable orbits that would allow for an easy proof.<sup>[https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1438019511155691521/1533270850961412107]</sup> | ** On August 2, @-d noticed that holdout #601 iterates a chaotic map, possibly meaning it has no stable orbits that would allow for an easy proof.<sup>[https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1438019511155691521/1533270850961412107]</sup> | ||
** On August 3, @-d identified 19 of the 21 remaining size 23 holdouts as hydra-like; the two remaining holdouts (#601 and #163) were described as "ugly" and "messy" respectively.<sup>[https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1438019511155691521/1533686184092631050]</sup> | ** On August 3, @-d identified 19 of the 21 remaining size 23 holdouts as hydra-like; the two remaining holdouts (#601 and #163) were described as "ugly" and "messy" respectively.<sup>[https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1438019511155691521/1533686184092631050]</sup> | ||
** On August 4, @-d used Opus 4.8 to prove holdout #163 non-halting, as it fell into a stable orbit; another 4 holdouts have been removed due to equivalence, and another 3 holdouts have been removed due to implications. 12 of the remaining 13 holdouts follow different Hydra-like mechanisms and are Cryptids (a total of 90 size 23 machines are equivalent to one of these 12 holdouts), with the remaining holdout (#601) being previously described as | ** On August 4, @-d used Opus 4.8 to prove holdout #163 non-halting, as it fell into a stable orbit; another 4 holdouts have been removed due to equivalence, and another 3 holdouts have been removed due to implications. 12 of the remaining 13 holdouts follow different Hydra-like mechanisms and are Cryptids (a total of 90 size 23 machines are equivalent to one of these 12 holdouts), with the remaining holdout (#601) being previously described as an ugly version of BMO1.<sup>[https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1438019511155691521/1534417541265363087]</sup> | ||
** On August 22, @-d enumerated 20% of BBf(24), discovering a new champion, which runs for over 4.804 × 10<sup>1,184</sup> steps.<sup>[https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1438019511155691521/1540831684071530637]</sup> | ** On August 22, @-d enumerated 20% of BBf(24), discovering a new champion, which runs for over 4.804 × 10<sup>1,184</sup> steps.<sup>[https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1438019511155691521/1540831684071530637]</sup> | ||
** On the same day, Shawn Ligocki discovered a new BBf(24) champion which runs for over 9.263 × 10<sup>9,595</sup> steps.<sup>[https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1438019511155691521/1540835303202492467]</sup> | ** On the same day, Shawn Ligocki discovered a new BBf(24) champion which runs for over 9.263 × 10<sup>9,595</sup> steps.<sup>[https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1438019511155691521/1540835303202492467]</sup> | ||
Revision as of 13:29, 5 October 2026
| Prev: July 2026 | This Month in Beaver Research | Next: September 2026 |
This edition of TMBR is in progress and has not yet been released. Please add any notes you think may be relevant (including in the form a of a TODO with a link to any relevant Discord discussion).
General
- On August 2, @carrino, using Claude AI solved the last 290 holdouts, meaning BBB(4) is solved! Specifically, @carrino proved that BBB(4) = 32,779,478, the champion being
1RB1LC_1RD1RB_0RD0RC_1LD1LA(bbch), discovered by Nick Drozd in July 2021,[1] which quasihalts by turning into a period 1 translated cycler after 32,779,478 steps.[2]
BB Adjacent
- Fractran
- On August 1, @-d used Opus 4.8 to write two deciders, potentially reducing the number of BBf(23) holdouts from 21,233 to 694.[3]
- The new holdout lists are unofficial, as the correctness of the deciders has not yet been verified.
- On the same day, @-d used Opus 4.8 to decide 602 of the 694 remaining holdouts individually, and to create equivalences and implications between the remaining holdouts. As a result, 21 holdouts remain in another unofficial holdout list.[4]
- On the same day, Shawn Ligocki isolated one of the 21 remaining holdouts (#601 in the original 694 holdout list) as non-Hydra-like. They say that its behavior is a mix of Collatz-like and BMO1.[5]
- On August 2, @-d noticed that holdout #601 iterates a chaotic map, possibly meaning it has no stable orbits that would allow for an easy proof.[6]
- On August 3, @-d identified 19 of the 21 remaining size 23 holdouts as hydra-like; the two remaining holdouts (#601 and #163) were described as "ugly" and "messy" respectively.[7]
- On August 4, @-d used Opus 4.8 to prove holdout #163 non-halting, as it fell into a stable orbit; another 4 holdouts have been removed due to equivalence, and another 3 holdouts have been removed due to implications. 12 of the remaining 13 holdouts follow different Hydra-like mechanisms and are Cryptids (a total of 90 size 23 machines are equivalent to one of these 12 holdouts), with the remaining holdout (#601) being previously described as an ugly version of BMO1.[8]
- On August 22, @-d enumerated 20% of BBf(24), discovering a new champion, which runs for over 4.804 × 101,184 steps.[9]
- On the same day, Shawn Ligocki discovered a new BBf(24) champion which runs for over 9.263 × 109,595 steps.[10]
- On August 26, Shawn Ligocki discovered two new size 24 halters (non-champions) which have behaviors similar to Collatz-like and BMO1.[11]
- On August 1, @-d used Opus 4.8 to write two deciders, potentially reducing the number of BBf(23) holdouts from 21,233 to 694.[3]
- TT (Terminating Turmites)
- On August 2, Discord user creeperman7002 discovered a new step and score champion for TT(3,3),
1PB2PA0PC_2TB1PC2PB_2PB1PZ0PA, running for 715,764,479 steps.[12] - On August 8, Discord user creeperman7002 discovered a new step champion for TT(3,3),
1PB0TC1PA_2PC1PZ2PA_2TC0PA2PC, running for 2.27 × 10248 steps.[13] - On August 11, Discord user creeperman7002 released a TT(3,3) holdouts list consisting of 19,368 holdouts.[14]
- On August 2, Discord user creeperman7002 discovered a new step and score champion for TT(3,3),
- SKI Calculus
- On August 6, Δ⁵ discovered a new champion for Ξ₀SK(16).[15]
- On the same day, Δ⁵ discovered a new champion for Ξ₀BCKW(6).[16]
- On August 14, Δ⁵ discovered another new champion for Ξ₀SK(16).[17]
- On August 20, Δ⁵ discovered new hexational champions for Ξ₀(17), Ξ₀(18), and Ξ₀(19) in the SKI calculus, and Ξ₀SK(23), Ξ₀SK(24), and Ξ₀SK(25) in the SK calculus.[18]
- On the same day, Δ⁵ discovered another new champion for Ξ₀SK(25).[19]
- Lambda Calculus

- Pebble Automaton
- On August 8, AlephSquirrel introduced the Busy Beaver function for Pebble Automata, peBBle(n), proving the values of peBBle(n) for sizes 1 to 3.[24]
- On the same day, sheep discovered an infinite family of automata, including the champion for peBBle(4), showing peBBle(n) ≥ . [25]
- On August 9, AlephSquirrel discovered a new champion for peBBle(5).[26]
- On August 10, Deccy discovered a new champion for peBBle(6)[27]
- On August 11, Deccy discovered a new champion for peBBle(7).[28]
- On August 13, mathmasterzach discovered 3 new peBBle(8) champions in quick succession,[29][30][31] and the previous peBBle(9) champion, which runs for 323 steps.[32]
- On August 16, AlephSquirrel proved the peBBle(4) champion to be optimal.[33]
- On August 17, AlephSquirrel improved the peBBle(9) champion, creating a new automaton which runs for 63,577 steps.[34]
- Diophantine Equation
- On August 12, Shawn Ligocki extracted new bounds for BBdio(n) for heights 40, 48, 57, and 66, based on work done in the sums of three cubes problem.[35][36]
- On the same day, Shawn Ligocki suggested calling the equation , and similar equations from the sums of three cubes problem, Cryptids,[37][38] though their classification was later changed to that of energy vampire,[39] following an objection by sheep;[40][41] she suggested calling them "energy vampired [sic]",[42] as these equations are expected to be solvable in practice, though they may be computationally hard to find solutions for.[43]
- On August 14, Shawn Ligocki rediscovered papers (and a post on StackExchange) from Bogdan Grechuk that imply BBdio(29) > 106,[44] and that BBdio(31) is decidable.[45]
- On August 23, star discovered the height 78 equation , which is expected to not have any solutions, but may be very difficult to prove.[46]. She also discovered the height 135 equation ,[47] which is also expected to not have any solutions, but may be difficult to prove, in much the same way that the sums of three cubes problem is hard.
- CounterScript
- On August 13, Azerty made a size 16 program which returns the nth Fibonacci number.[48]
- On August 15, sheep made a size 35 program that tests the primality of a number.[49]
- On August 24, sheep discovered a set of Collatz-like programs,[50] some of which simulate random unbiased walks.[51][52][53] However, they are not champions, due to the existence of smaller tetrational and pentational machines.
- On the same day, Shawn Ligocki released a personal BBCS(12) holdouts list consisting of 13,580 holdouts, used for direct simulation.[54]

- Cyclic Tag
- On August 26, Azerty introduced the Busy Beaver function for Cyclic Tag Systems, BBCT(n),[57] proving the values of BBCT(n) for sizes 1 to 4, and providing lower bounds for BBCT(n) for sizes 1 to 12.[58]
- On the same day, sheep rediscovered literature that provided lower bounds for BBCT(n) for sizes 1 to 9.[59]
- On August 30, sheep discovered a size 36 Cryptid, showing BBCT(36) is hard.[60]
- General Recursive Function
Holdouts
| Domain | New Holdout Count | Previous Holdout Count | Holdout Reduction | % Reduction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BB(6) | 999 | 1,064 | 65 | 6.11% |
| BB(4,3) | 4,720,332 | 4,747,566 | 27,234 | 0.57% |

1RB0LB_0RC1RF 1LD1RE_0LA0RB_0RD0LD_0LE--- (1LD1RE_0LA0RB_0RD0LD_0LE---&status=halt bbch), is shown here in mxdys's Turing Machine simulator using longitudinal analysis, which prurq used to confirm the result. (Image source: prurq)- BB(6)
- On August 1, mxdys added BMO 9 and BMO 10 to the Beaver Math Olympiad.[63][64]
- On August 3, prurq simulated three machines to halting.[65][66][67]
- On August 4, q64 proved another machine halting.[68]
- On August 15, Discord user jacobrschwartz proved another machine halting.[69]
- On the same day, mxdys released a new holdouts list of 1,016 machines up to equivalence,[70] this is a 4.51% reduction compared to the previous holdouts lists.
- On the same day, mxdys, using an LLM, produced proofs deciding 20 machines, with 18 proofs under review at the time.[71]
- On August 24, Discord user flintt_6 informally proved another machine halting.[72]
- On the same day, mxdys released a list of machines that are easy to accelerate using the UBRRBA decider, consisting of 86 machines.[73]
- On August 25, prurq simulated another machine to halting.[74]
- On August 26, q64 proved another machine halting.[75]
- On August 29, mxdys released another holdouts list of 1,003 machines up to equivalence.[76]
- On August 31, mxdys released another holdouts list of 999 machines up to equivalence,[77] breaking the 1,000 holdout barrier.
- BB(4,3)
- Andrew Ducharme reduced the number of holdouts from 4,747,566 to 4,720,332 (a 0.57% reduction) via the mxdys FAR decider.[78]
- BB(2,7)
- Terry Ligocki enumerated 150K more subtasks, increasing the number of holdouts to 2,651,060,579. A total of 850K subtasks out of the 1 million subtasks (or 85%) have been enumerated.