Bigfoot: Difference between revisions

From BusyBeaverWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
Polygon (talk | contribs)
Added Category:BB(3,3)
Line 64: Line 64:
==References==
==References==
<references/>
<references/>
[[Category:Cryptids]]
[[Category:BB(3,3)]][[Category:Cryptids]]

Revision as of 16:20, 27 September 2025

Unsolved problem:
Does Bigfoot run forever?

Bigfoot (1RB2RA1LC_2LC1RB2RB_---2LA1LA (bbch)) is a BB(3,3) Cryptid. Its low-level behaviour was first shared over Discord by savask on 14 Oct 2023, and within two days, Shawn Ligocki described the high-level rules shown below, whose attributes inspired the Turing machine's name.[1]

0 1 2
A 1RB 2RA 1LC
B 2LC 1RB 2RB
C --- 2LA 1LA
The transition table of Bigfoot.

In May of 2024, Iijil compiled Bigfoot into a 7-state 2-symbol machine 0RB1RB_1LC0RA_1RE1LF_1LF1RE_0RD1RD_1LG0LG_---1LB (bbch).

Analysis

Let A(a,b,c):=0∞12a12b<A12c0∞. Then, A(a,6b,c)→4a+(2b+1)48b+(12b+1)2c+13A(a,8b+c−1,2),A(a,6b+1,c)→4a+(6b+5)16b+(4b+1)6c+29A(a+1,8b+c−1,3),A(0,6b+2,c)→(b+1)96b+(3b+1)8c+180∞<C116b+2c+520∞,A(a,6b+2,c)→4a+(2b+3)48b+(12b+7)2c+51A(a−1,8b+c+3,2) if a≥1,A(a,6b+3,c)→4a+(6b+7)16b+(12b+5)2c+91A(a,8b+c+1,5),A(a,6b+4,c)→4a+(2b+3)48b+(12b+7)2c+63A(a+1,8b+c+3,2),A(a,6b+5,c)→4a+(6b+11)16b+(4b+3)6c+103A(a,8b+c+5,3).

Proof

For now, we will work with the slightly different configuration A′(a,b,c):=0∞12a1b<A1c0∞. Consider the partial configuration P(m,n):=1m<A1n0∞. We first require the following shift rule: A>1s→s2sA> Using this shift rule, we get 1m−12n+1A>0∞ after n+1 steps, followed by 1m−12n<C1220∞ four steps later. Observing that 22<C becomes <C11 in two steps leads to another shift rule: 22s<C→2s<C12s From here, there are two different scenarios depending on if n is even or odd, given below as histories of transitions that use the aforementioned shift rules:

  1. If n≡0 (mod⁡2), then what follows is:1m−12n<C1220∞→n1m−1<C1n+1220∞→41m−3<A1n+3220∞→n+41m−42n+4A>220∞→11m−42n+4<C120∞→n+41m−4<C1n+520∞→41m−6<A1n+720∞→n+81m−72n+8A>20∞→11m−72n+8<C10∞→n+81m−7<C1n+90∞→41m−9<A1n+110∞Therefore, we haveP(m,n)→6n+43P(m−9,n+11) if m≥9 and n≡0 (mod⁡2).
  2. If n≡1 (mod⁡2), then what follows is:1m−12n<C1220∞→n−11m−12<C1n220∞→11m−1<A1n+1220∞→n+21m−22n+2A>220∞→11m−22n+2<C120∞→n+11m−22<C1n+220∞→11m−2<A1n+320∞→n+41m−32n+4A>20∞→11m−32n+4<C10∞→n+31m−32<C1n+40∞→11m−3<A1n+50∞Therefore, we have

P(m,n)→6n+19P(m−3,n+5) if m≥3 and n≡1 (mod⁡2). From this we know that Bigfoot's behaviour depends on the value of b modulo 12, and with A′(a,b,c) we have P(b,c). The following shift rules will be useful: 12s<A→2s<A21sB>1s→s1sB>B>2s→s2sB> Only even values of b and c are relevant, so there remain six possible scenarios:

  1. If b≡0 (mod⁡12), then in ∑i=0b/12−1(6(16i+c)+43+6(16i+11+c)+19)=∑i=0b/12−14(48i+3c+32)=23b2+83b+bc steps we arrive at P(0,16×b12+c), or 0∞12a<A14b/3+c0∞ when considering the complete configuration. What follows is:0∞12a<A14b/3+c0∞→2a0∞<A21a14b/3+c0∞→10∞1B>21a14b/3+c0∞→2a+4b/3+c0∞12a14b/3+c+1B>0∞→120∞12a14b/3+c−2<A140∞This means that if 43b+c≥2, then we will reach A′(a,43b+c−2,4) in 4a+23b2+4b+bc+c+13 steps.
  2. If b≡2 (mod⁡12), then in ∑i=0(b−2)/12−14(48i+3c+32)=23b2+bc−2c−83 steps we arrive at P(2,4(b−2)3+c), or 0∞12a11<A1(4b−2)/3+c0∞. What follows is:0∞12a11<A14(b−2)/3+c0∞→4(b−2)/3+c+10∞12a124(b−2)/3+c+1A>0∞→40∞12a124(b−2)/3+c<C1220∞→4(b−2)/3+c0∞12a1<C14(b−2)/3+c+1220∞→10∞12a<A214(b−2)/3+c+1220∞→2a0∞<A21a214(b−2)/3+c+1220∞→10∞1B>21a214(b−2)/3+c+1220∞→4(b−2)/3+2a+c+40∞12a+114(b−2)/3+c+122B>0∞→180∞12a+114(b−2)/3+c−2<A160∞This means that if 4(b−2)3+c≥2, then we will reach A′(a+1,4b−143+c,6) in 4a+23b2+4b+bc+c+553 steps.
  3. If b≡4 (mod⁡12), then in 23b2−83b+bc−4c steps we arrive at P(4,4(b−4)3+c), or 0∞12a1111<A14(b−4)/3+c0∞. What follows is:0∞12a1111<A14(b−4)/3+c0∞→(8b−14)/3+2c0∞12a11<A214(b−4)/3+c+1220∞→30∞12a1<A14(b−4)/3+c+3220∞→4(b−4)/3+c+40∞12a24(b−4)/3+c+4A>220∞→10∞12a24(b−4)/3+c+4<C120∞→4(b−4)/3+c+40∞12a<C14(b−4)/3+c+520∞→10∞12a−11<A14(b−4)/3+c+620∞→4(b−4)/3+c+70∞12a−124(b−4)/3+c+7A>20∞→10∞12a−124(b−4)/3+c+7<C10∞→4(b−4)/3+c+60∞12a−12<C14(b−4)/3+c+70∞→10∞12a−1<A14(b−4)/3+c+80∞→2(a−1)0∞<A21a−114(b−4)/3+c+80∞→10∞1B>21a−114(b−4)/3+c+80∞→2a+4(b−4)/3+c+60∞12a−114(b−4)/3+c+9B>0∞→120∞12a−114(b−4)/3+c+6<A140∞This means that if a=0, then Bigfoot will reach the undefined C0 transition with the configuration 0∞<C1(4b−1)/3+c20∞ in 23b2+83b+bc−103 steps. Otherwise, it will proceed to reach A′(a−1,4b+23+c,4) in 4a+23b2+203b+bc+3c+413 steps.
  4. If b≡6 (mod⁡12), then in 23b2−163b+bc−6c+8 steps we arrive at P(6,4(b−6)3+c), or 0∞12a111111<A14(b−6)/3+c0∞. What follows is:0∞12a111111<A14(b−6)/3+c0∞→16b/3+4c−140∞12a11<C14(b−6)/3+c+520∞→40∞12a<A14(b−6)/3+c+720∞→2a0∞<A21a14(b−6)/3+c+720∞→10∞1B>21a14(b−6)/3+c+720∞→2a+4(b−6)/3+c+80∞12a14(b−6)/3+c+82B>0∞→600∞12a14(b−6)/3+c+2<A1100∞This means that we will reach A′(a,43b+c−6,10) in 4a+23b2+43b+bc−c+59 steps.
  5. If b≡8 (mod⁡12), then in 23b2−8b+bc−8c+643 steps we arrive at P(8,4(b−8)3+c), or 0∞12a18<A14(b−8)/3+c0∞. What follows is:0∞12a18<A14(b−8)/3+c0∞→(16b−62)/3+4c0∞12a11<A14(b−8)/3+c+720∞→4(b−8)/3+c+80∞12a124(b−8)/3+c+8A>20∞→10∞12a124(b−8)/3+c+8<C10∞→4(b−8)/3+c+80∞12a1<C14(b−8)/3+c+90∞→10∞12a<A214(b−8)/3+c+90∞→2a0∞<A21a214(b−8)/3+c+90∞→10∞1B>21a214(b−8)/3+c+90∞→2a+4(b−8)/3+c+100∞12a+114(b−8)/3+c+9B>0∞→120∞12a+114(b−8)/3+c+6<A140∞This means that we will reach A′(a+1,4b−143+c,4) in 4a+23b2+43b+bc−c+293 steps.
  6. If b≡10 (mod⁡12), then in 23b2−323b+bc−10c+40 steps we arrive at P(10,4(b−10)3+c), or 0∞12a110<A14(b−10)/3+c0∞. What follows is:0∞12a110<A14(b−10)/3+c0∞→8b+6c−370∞12a1<A14(b−10)/3+c+110∞→4(b−10)/3+c+120∞12a24(b−10)/3+c+12A>0∞→40∞12a24(b−10)/3+c+11<C1220∞→4(b−10)/3+c+100∞12a2<C14(b−10)/3+c+11220∞→10∞12a<A14(b−10)/3+c+12220∞→2a0∞<A12a14(b−10)/3+c+12220∞→10∞1B>12a14(b−10)/3+c+12220∞→2a+4(b−10)/3+c+140∞12a14(b−10)/3+c+1322B>0∞→180∞12a14(b−10)/3+c+10<A160∞This means that we will reach A′(a,4b−103+c,6) in 4a+23b2+43b+bc−c+23 steps.

The information above can be summarized as A′(a,b,c)→{A′(a,43b+c−2,4)if b≡0(mod12) and 43b+c≥2,A′(a+1,4b−143+c,6)if b≡2(mod12) and 4(b−2)3+c≥2,0∞<C1(4b−1)/3+c20∞if b≡4(mod12) and a=0,A′(a−1,4b+23+c,4)if b≡4(mod12) and a>0,A′(a,43b+c−6,10)if b≡6(mod12),A′(a+1,4b−143+c,4)if b≡8(mod12),A′(a,4b−103+c,6)if b≡10(mod12). Using the definitions of A′ and A to transform these rules produces this: A(a,b,c)→{A(a,43b+c−1,2)if b≡0(mod6) and 43b+c≥1,A(a+1,4b−73+c,3)if b≡1(mod6) and 4(b−1)3+c≥1,0∞<C1(8b−1)/3+2c20∞if b≡2(mod6) and a=0,A(a−1,4b+13+c,2)if b≡2(mod6) and a>0,A(a,43b+c−3,5)if b≡3(mod6),A(a+1,4b−73+c,2)if b≡4(mod6),A(a,4b−53+c,3)if b≡5(mod6). Substituting b←6b+k where k is the remainder for each case yields the final result.

Using the floor function, it is possible to describe the behaviour of b and c using a function that is not defined piecewise: f(m,n)=(4m−3−4(δ1(m)−δ2(m)+δ4(m))−2(3δ3(m)+δ5(m))3+n,2+δ1(m)+3δ3(m)+δ5(m)),δi(m)=⌊m−i6⌋−⌊m−i−16⌋={1if m≡i(mod6),0otherwise. In effect, the halting problem for Bigfoot is about whether through enough iterations of f(m,n) we encounter more m values that are congruent to 2 modulo 6 than ones that are congruent to 1 or 4 modulo 6.

An important insight is that if b is odd and c=2, then after four iterations of A, that will remain the case. This allows one to define a configuration that eliminates the c parameter and whose rules use a modulus of 81.[1]

Trajectory

After 69 steps, Bigfoot will reach the configuration A(2,1,2) before the Collatz-like rules are repeatedly applied. Simulations of Bigfoot have shown that after 24000000 rule steps, we have a=3999888. Here are the first few: A(2,1,2)→49A(3,1,3)→59A(4,2,3)→109A(3,6,2)→221A(3,9,2)→379A(3,11,5)→597A(3,18,3)→⋯ There exists a heuristic argument for Bigfoot being probviously non-halting. By only considering the rules for which a changes, one may notice that the trajectory of a values can be approximated by a random walk in which at each step, the walker moves +1 with probability 23 or moves -1 with probability 13, starting at position 2. If P(n) is the probability that the walker will reach position -1 from position n, then P(n)=13P(n−1)+23P(n+1). Solutions to this recurrence relation come in the form P(n)=c02−n+c1, which after applying the appropriate boundary conditions reduces to P(n)=2−(n+1). As a result, if the walker gets to position 3999888, then the probability of it ever reaching position -1 would be 2−3999889≈2.697×10−1204087.

References

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 S. Ligocki, "BB(3, 3) is Hard (Bigfoot) (2024). Accessed 22 July 2024.