SKI Calculus: Difference between revisions
Added BCKW system. |
→Champions: Updated bounds and removed misinformation |
||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
|≥ 41 | |≥ 41 | ||
|SSS(S(SS))S | |SSS(S(SS))S | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|8 | |8 | ||
|≥ 80 | |≥ 80 | ||
|SSK(S(SS)S)S | |SSK(S(SS)S)S | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|9 | |9 | ||
|≥ 169 | |≥ 169 | ||
|S(SS)(SS)(SS)SS | |S(SS)(SS)(SS)SS | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|10 | |10 | ||
|≥ 376 | |≥ 376 | ||
|S(S(SS(KK)))(SS)(SS) | |S(S(SS(KK)))(SS)(SS) | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|11 | |11 | ||
|≥ 912 | |≥ 912 | ||
|S(SS)S(SS)(S(S(KS))S) | |S(SS)S(SS)(S(S(KS))S) | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|12 | |12 | ||
|≥ 196606 | |≥ 196606 | ||
|S(S(SI))I(S(S(KS)K)I)K | |S(S(SI))I(S(S(KS)K)I)K | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|13 | |13 | ||
|> 2^2^2^21 | |> 2^2^2^21 | ||
|S(S(SSS)I)I(S(S(KS)K)I) | |S(S(SSS)I)I(S(S(KS)K)I) | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|14 | |14 | ||
|> 2^^18 | |> 2^^18 | ||
|S(S(S(SSS))I)I(S(S(KS)K)I) | |S(S(S(SSS))I)I(S(S(KS)K)I) | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|15 | |15 | ||
|> 2^^2^128 | |> 2^^2^128 | ||
|SSK(S(S(KS)K)I)(S(SSSI)I) | |SSK(S(S(KS)K)I)(S(SSSI)I) | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|16 | |16 | ||
|> 2^^2^2^2^2^21 | |> 2^^2^2^2^2^21 | ||
|SSK(S(S(KS)K)I)(S(S(SSS)I)I) | |SSK(S(S(KS)K)I)(S(S(SSS)I)I) | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|17 | |17 | ||
|> 2^^^2^128 | |> 2^^^2^128 | ||
|S(SSK(S(SSSI)I))I(S(S(KS)K)I) | |S(SSK(S(SSSI)I))I(S(S(KS)K)I) | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|18 | |18 | ||
|> 2 | |> 2^^^2^2^2^2^21 | ||
|S(S( | |S(SSK(S(S(SSS)I)I))I(S(S(KS)K)I)) | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|19 | |19 | ||
|> 2 | |> 2^^^2^^19 | ||
|S(S(S( | |S(SSK(S(S(S(SSS))I)I))I(S(S(KS)K)I) | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|20 | |20 | ||
|> Graham's Number | |> Graham's Number | ||
|S(S(S(SI)))I(S(K(S(SS(K(K(S(S(KS)K)I))))))K) | |S(S(S(SI)))I(S(K(S(SS(K(K(S(S(KS)K)I))))))K) | ||
| | | | ||
|} | |} | ||
| Line 121: | Line 121: | ||
|≥ 41 | |≥ 41 | ||
|SSS(S(SS))S | |SSS(S(SS))S | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|8 | |8 | ||
| Line 127: | Line 127: | ||
|≥ 80 | |≥ 80 | ||
|SSK(S(SS)S)S | |SSK(S(SS)S)S | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|9 | |9 | ||
| Line 133: | Line 133: | ||
|≥ 169 | |≥ 169 | ||
|S(SS)(SS)(SS)SS | |S(SS)(SS)(SS)SS | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|10 | |10 | ||
| Line 139: | Line 139: | ||
|≥ 376 | |≥ 376 | ||
|S(S(SS(KK)))(SS)(SS) | |S(S(SS(KK)))(SS)(SS) | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|11 | |11 | ||
| Line 145: | Line 145: | ||
|≥ 912 | |≥ 912 | ||
|S(SS)S(SS)(S(S(KS))S) | |S(SS)S(SS)(S(S(KS))S) | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|12 | |12 | ||
| Line 151: | Line 151: | ||
|≥ 913 | |≥ 913 | ||
|S(S(SS)S(SS)(S(S(KS))S)) | |S(S(SS)S(SS)(S(S(KS))S)) | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|13 | |13 | ||
| Line 157: | Line 157: | ||
|≥ 914 | |≥ 914 | ||
|S(S(S(SS)S(SS)(S(S(KS))S))) | |S(S(S(SS)S(SS)(S(S(KS))S))) | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|14 | |14 | ||
Revision as of 04:43, 26 May 2026
A SKI calculus program is a binary tree where the leaves are combinators, the three symbols S, K, I. Using parentheses to notate the tree, a simple example of a SKI program is (((SK)S)((KI)S)). We can omit parentheses by assuming they are left-binding by default, so we simplify our program to SKS(KIS).
Like lambda calculus, SKI calculus has a process called beta-reduction. We change the tree according to any reducible redex.
- Sxyz → xz(yz)
- Kxy → x
- Ix → x
Note that xyz represent any valid trees, not just single combinators. We repeat this process and we say it terminates if the combinator cannot be beta-reduced.
Busy Beaver for SKI calculus (BB_SKI) is a variation of the Busy Beaver problem for lambda calculus. BB_SKI(n) is defined as the size of the largest output of a terminating program of size n.
Champions
| n | Value | Champion | Discovered by |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | = 1 | S | |
| 2 | = 2 | SS | |
| 3 | = 3 | SSS | |
| 4 | = 4 | SSSS | |
| 5 | = 6 | SSS(SS) | |
| 6 | = 17 | SSS(SI)S | |
| 7 | ≥ 41 | SSS(S(SS))S | |
| 8 | ≥ 80 | SSK(S(SS)S)S | |
| 9 | ≥ 169 | S(SS)(SS)(SS)SS | |
| 10 | ≥ 376 | S(S(SS(KK)))(SS)(SS) | |
| 11 | ≥ 912 | S(SS)S(SS)(S(S(KS))S) | |
| 12 | ≥ 196606 | S(S(SI))I(S(S(KS)K)I)K | |
| 13 | > 2^2^2^21 | S(S(SSS)I)I(S(S(KS)K)I) | |
| 14 | > 2^^18 | S(S(S(SSS))I)I(S(S(KS)K)I) | |
| 15 | > 2^^2^128 | SSK(S(S(KS)K)I)(S(SSSI)I) | |
| 16 | > 2^^2^2^2^2^21 | SSK(S(S(KS)K)I)(S(S(SSS)I)I) | |
| 17 | > 2^^^2^128 | S(SSK(S(SSSI)I))I(S(S(KS)K)I) | |
| 18 | > 2^^^2^2^2^2^21 | S(SSK(S(S(SSS)I)I))I(S(S(KS)K)I)) | |
| 19 | > 2^^^2^^19 | S(SSK(S(S(S(SSS))I)I))I(S(S(KS)K)I) | |
| 20 | > Graham's Number | S(S(S(SI)))I(S(K(S(SS(K(K(S(S(KS)K)I))))))K) |
SK calculus
We can remove the I combinator and replace it by (SKS), (SKK) or any (SKx). These terms have a straightforward binary encoding where (prefix) application is 1, K=00, and S=01. Since n combinators take n-1 applications to combine, their code length is 2n + n-1 = 3n-1 bits.
Champions
| n | bits | Value | Champion | Discovered by |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | = 1 | S | |
| 2 | 5 | = 2 | SS | |
| 3 | 8 | = 3 | SSS | |
| 4 | 11 | = 4 | SSSS | |
| 5 | 14 | = 6 | SSS(SS) | |
| 6 | 17 | = 10 | SSS(SS)S | |
| 7 | 20 | ≥ 41 | SSS(S(SS))S | |
| 8 | 23 | ≥ 80 | SSK(S(SS)S)S | |
| 9 | 26 | ≥ 169 | S(SS)(SS)(SS)SS | |
| 10 | 29 | ≥ 376 | S(S(SS(KK)))(SS)(SS) | |
| 11 | 32 | ≥ 912 | S(SS)S(SS)(S(S(KS))S) | |
| 12 | 35 | ≥ 913 | S(S(SS)S(SS)(S(S(KS))S)) | |
| 13 | 38 | ≥ 914 | S(S(S(SS)S(SS)(S(S(KS))S))) | |
| 14 | 41 | ≥ 1530 | SS(SKK)(SS)(SS(SS(SS)))S | |
| 15 | 44 | ≥ 7811 | SS(SKK)(SS)(SS(SS(SSS)))S |
TODO: Champions analysis.
BCKW system
BCKW system is a variation of SK calculus that replace the S combinator by 3 other simpler combinators.
- Bxyz → x(yz)
- Cxyz → xzy
- Kxy → x
- Wxy → xyy
Champions
| n | Value | Champion | Discovered by |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | = 1 | B | |
| 2 | = 2 | BB | |
| 3 | = 3 | BBB | |
| 4 | = 5 | WB(BB) | |
| 5 | = 7 | WB(BBB) | |
| 6 | = 11 | WB(WB(BB)) | |
| 7 | = 15 | WB(WB(BBB)) | |
| 8 | = 23 | WB(WB(WB(BB))) | |
| 9 | = 31 | WB(WB(WB(BBB))) | |
| 10 | = 47 | WB(WB(WB(WB(BB)))) |
Oracles
We can extend BB_SKI with oracles, making it stronger than BB. For example, we can add an oracle combinator O where Ofxy=x iff for all z fz=z, and y otherwise. The resulting busy beaver, known as the Xi function, is estimated to be faster-growing than ordinal oracle busy beavers with the oracle degree <= w_1^CK. A further extension would be to add another oracle, O’, where O’fxy=x iff f is well-founded, and y otherwise, where a term is well-founded iff there is no infinitely nested outermost-redex oracle calls. The resulting busy beaver is called Xi_2.