TMBR: October 2025: Difference between revisions

From BusyBeaverWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Champions: Reword champion text.
Holdouts: Put holdout details into an expandable box
Line 58: Line 58:
|0.4%
|0.4%
|}
|}
<div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed">'''Details'''<div class="mw-collapsible-content">
* [[BB(6)|BB(6):]]
* [[BB(6)|BB(6):]]
** @mxdys [https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1239205785913790465/1429892916763033601 shared a new holdouts list on October 20th,] consisting of 1618 machines up to equivalence, or 3067 individual machines. This means 73 newly solved machines, a 4% reduction.  
** @mxdys [https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1239205785913790465/1429892916763033601 shared a new holdouts list on October 20th,] consisting of 1618 machines up to equivalence, or 3067 individual machines. This means 73 newly solved machines, a 4% reduction.  
Line 74: Line 76:
*[[BB(2,6)|BB(2,6):]]
*[[BB(2,6)|BB(2,6):]]
**Andrew Ducharme has completed [[BB(2,6)#Stage 3|Stage 3 of Phase 2]], reducing the number of holdouts from 873,469 to 870,085. (0.39% reduction)
**Andrew Ducharme has completed [[BB(2,6)#Stage 3|Stage 3 of Phase 2]], reducing the number of holdouts from 873,469 to 870,085. (0.39% reduction)
</div></div>


== Theory ==
== Theory ==

Revision as of 18:08, 2 November 2025

Prev: September 2025 This Month in Beaver Research Next: November 2025

This edition of TMBR is in progress and has not yet been released. Please add any notes you think may be relevant (including in the form a of a TODO with a link to any relevant Discord discussion).

TODO: BB(3x3) month

TODO: BB(2x5) month next month (?)

A brave busy beaver confronts the dreaded Antihydra. Copyright Nico Roper.

Misc

@Bricks shared a method to measure susceptibility to block-analysis1, which resulted in the following spreadsheet of machines which should be easiest to solve using Block-Analysis.

@coda shared a mechanical implementation of a Turing Machine1, Antihydra.

Wily Coyote, a BB(3,3) holdout

Blog Posts

Champions

Polygon identified a new BB(4,3) champion with a score of over 1044 (1RB1RD1LC_2LB1RB1LC_1RZ1LA1LD_0RB2RA2RD (bbch)). This TM was first proven to halt by Pavel Kropitz in May 2024, but it's runtime was not known at the time.

Holdouts

BB(6) Holdouts count decrease overtime.
BB(6) Holdouts count decrease overtime.
BB Holdout Reduction by Domain
Domain New Holdout Count Previous Holdout Count Holdout Reduction % Reduction
BB(6) 1618 1691 73 4.3%
BB(7) 20,405,295 22,801,601 2,396,306 10.5%
BB(4,3) 9,401,447 460,916,384 451,514,937 98.0%
BB(3,4) 15,136,283 434,787,751 419,651,468 96.6%
BB(2,6) 870,085 873,469 3384 0.4%
Details

Theory

Piecewise Affine Functions (PAF) were explored as a generalization of the BMO1 rules:

  • @Bard proved that 3 dimension PAF are Turing complete: [1]
  • @star proved that 2 dimension PAF are Turing complete: [2]
  • Shawn Ligocki wrote up a proof sketch that 2-region PAF are Turing complete: [3]
  • It was discovered that Amir Ben-Amram had already proven that 2-dim and 2-region PAF were Turing complete in 2015.
  • BMO1 is a 2-dim, 2-region PAF so this provides some sense for the difficulty of the problem.

Deciders

  • Inductive deciders
    • -d rewrote quick_sim.py in C++, achieving a 6-10x faster runtime12.
    • Katelyn Douchette is working on an automated inductive decider12. (see inductive proofs)