TMBR: October 2025: Difference between revisions

From BusyBeaverWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
RobinCodes (talk | contribs)
Corrected 2x5 holdout count from 67 to 64 machines. Used appropriate source formatting in "Theory" section (for consistency and structure)
RobinCodes (talk | contribs)
m More todo.
 
Line 2: Line 2:


TODO: BB(3x3) month
TODO: BB(3x3) month
TODO: BB(2x5) month next month (?)
[[File:Nico-BB-vs-Antihydra.jpg|thumb|A brave busy beaver confronts the dreaded Antihydra. Copyright [https://www.nicoroper.com/ Nico Roper].]]
[[File:Nico-BB-vs-Antihydra.jpg|thumb|A brave busy beaver confronts the dreaded Antihydra. Copyright [https://www.nicoroper.com/ Nico Roper].]]



Latest revision as of 17:29, 29 October 2025

Prev: September 2025 This Month in Beaver Research Next: November 2025

This edition of TMBR is in progress and has not yet been released. Please add any notes you think may be relevant (including in the form a of a TODO with a link to any relevant Discord discussion).

TODO: BB(3x3) month

TODO: BB(2x5) month next month (?)

A brave busy beaver confronts the dreaded Antihydra. Copyright Nico Roper.

Misc

TODO: Add the mechanical Turing Machine. discord source: https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1362008236118511758/1425889021653160026 and onwards

TODO: Add the method used by @Bricks to measure susceptibility to block-analysis. discord source: https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1239205785913790465/1430227817957953638 also results: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1j00LBxxp9W7uz1wZdMIvDCZ56eReuH0IGO9Z8-yybcQ/edit?usp=sharing

Wily Coyote, a BB(3,3) holdout

Blog Posts

Champions

Holdouts

BB(6) Holdouts count decrease overtime.
BB(6) Holdouts count decrease overtime.
BB Holdout Reduction by Domain
Domain New Holdout Count Previous Holdout Count Holdout Reduction % Reduction
BB(6) 1618 1691 73 4.3%
BB(7) 20,405,295 22,801,601 2,396,306 10.5%
BB(4,3) 9,401,447 460,916,384 451,514,937 98.0%
BB(3,4) 15,136,283 434,787,751 419,651,468 96.6%
BB(2,6) 870,085 873,469 3384 0.4%

Theory

Piecewise Affine Functions (PAF) were explored as a generalization of the BMO1 rules:

  • @Bard proved that 3 dimension PAF are Turing complete: [1]
  • @star proved that 2 dimension PAF are Turing complete: [2]
  • Shawn Ligocki wrote up a proof sketch that 2-region PAF are Turing complete: [3]
  • It was discovered that Amir Ben-Amram had already proven that 2-dim and 2-region PAF were Turing complete in 2015.
  • BMO1 is a 2-dim, 2-region PAF so this provides some sense for the difficulty of the problem.

Deciders

TODO: Add -d's cpp quick_sim project. Discord source: https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1226543091264126976/1426265937455222794

TODO: Add Katelyn's inductive project. Discord source:https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1369339127652159509/1419016459560161280 https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1095740122139480195/1427714010697961534