BB(6): Difference between revisions

From BusyBeaverWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Add domain category)
(→‎Cryptids: Split out probviously halting cryptids and add some description.)
Line 18: Line 18:


== Cryptids ==
== Cryptids ==
Known BB(6) Cryptids:
There have been quite a few [[Cryptids]] found in the BB(6) search space. None of them are known definitively to halt or run forever. Proving whether or not they halt would require solving a [[Collatz-like]] problem in order to be tractable. However, using probabilistic assumptions they have been categorized into either [[probviously]] halting or probviously non-halting.
 
Probviously halting Collatz-like Cryptids:
 
* {{TM|1RB1RA_0RC1RC_1LD0LF_0LE1LE_1RA0LB_---0LC|undecided}} (and 15 related TMs) a family of [[probviously]] halting cryptids
 
Probviously non-halting Collatz-like Cryptids:


* [[Antihydra]]
* [[Antihydra]]
Line 25: Line 31:
* {{TM|1RB0LD_1RC1RF_1LA0RA_0LA0LE_1LD1LA_0RB---|undecided}} similar to Antihydra
* {{TM|1RB0LD_1RC1RF_1LA0RA_0LA0LE_1LD1LA_0RB---|undecided}} similar to Antihydra
* {{TM|1RB0LB_1LC0RE_1LA1LD_0LC---_0RB0RF_1RE1RB|undecided}} similar to Antihydra
* {{TM|1RB0LB_1LC0RE_1LA1LD_0LC---_0RB0RF_1RE1RB|undecided}} similar to Antihydra
* {{TM|1RB1RA_0RC1RC_1LD0LF_0LE1LE_1RA0LB_---0LC|undecided}} (and 15 related TMs) a family of [[probviously]] halting cryptids
 
There are also a number of machines which also appear to depend upon different (not Collatz-like) apparently chaotic behavior and so also appear to be Cryptids. However, nobody has yet proposed a clear analysis of how their behavior is connected to open mathematical problems (like Collatz-like problems).


Potential Cryptids:
Potential Cryptids:

Revision as of 16:15, 2 March 2025

The 6-state, 2-symbol Busy Beaver problem BB(6) is unsolved. With the discovery of Antihydra in 2024, we now know that we must solve a Collatz-like problem in order to solve BB(6).

The current BB(6) champion 1RB0LD_1RC0RF_1LC1LA_0LE1RZ_1LF0RB_0RC0RE (bbch) was discovered by Pavel Kropitz in 2022 proving the lower bound:[1]

Techniques

In order to simulate the current BB(6) champion requires accelerated simulation that can handle Collatz Level 2 inductive rules. In other words, it requires a simulator that can prove the rules:

and also compute the remainder mod 3 of numbers produced by applying these rules 15 times (which requires some fancy math related to Euler's_totient_function).

Cryptids

There have been quite a few Cryptids found in the BB(6) search space. None of them are known definitively to halt or run forever. Proving whether or not they halt would require solving a Collatz-like problem in order to be tractable. However, using probabilistic assumptions they have been categorized into either probviously halting or probviously non-halting.

Probviously halting Collatz-like Cryptids:

Probviously non-halting Collatz-like Cryptids:

There are also a number of machines which also appear to depend upon different (not Collatz-like) apparently chaotic behavior and so also appear to be Cryptids. However, nobody has yet proposed a clear analysis of how their behavior is connected to open mathematical problems (like Collatz-like problems).

Potential Cryptids:

Top Halters

The current top 10 BB(6) halters (known by Shawn Ligocki) are:

Top Known BB(6) Halters
TM approximate sigma score
1RB0LD_1RC0RF_1LC1LA_0LE1RZ_1LF0RB_0RC0RE (bbch) ~10↑↑15.60465
1RB1RC_1LC1RE_1LD0LB_1RE1LC_1LE0RF_1RZ1RA (bbch) ~10↑↑7.23619
1RB0LA_1LC1LF_0LD0LC_0LE0LB_1RE0RA_1RZ1LD (bbch) ~10↑↑5.63534
1RB1RE_1LC1LF_1RD0LB_1LE0RC_1RA0LD_1RZ1LC (bbch) ~10↑↑5.56344
1RB0LE_0RC1RA_0LD1RF_1RE0RB_1LA0LC_0RD1RZ (bbch) ~10↑↑5.12468
1RB0RF_1LC1LB_0RE0LD_0LC0LB_0RA1RE_0RD1RZ (bbch) ~10↑↑5.03230
1RB1LA_1LC0RF_1LD1LC_1LE0RE_0RB0LC_1RZ1RA (bbch) ~10↑↑4.91072
1RB0LE_1LC1RA_1RE0LD_1LC1LF_1LA0RC_1RZ1LC (bbch) ~10↑↑3.33186
1RB1RF_1LC1RE_0LD1LB_1LA0RA_0RA0RB_1RZ0RD (bbch) ~10↑↑3.31128
1RB0LF_1LC0RA_1RD0LB_1LE1RC_1RZ1LA_1LA1LE (bbch) ~10↑↑3.18855

Runtimes are not available, but are presumed to be about which is roughly indistinguishable in tetration notation. Fractional tetration notation is described in "Extending Up-arrow Notation". For a longer list of halting TMs see https://github.com/sligocki/busy-beaver/blob/main/Machines/bb/6x2.txt. For historical perspective see Pascal Michel's Historical survey of Busy Beavers.

Holdouts

@mxdys's informal holdouts list is down to 4408 TMs as of 8 Nov 2024.

References

  1. Shawn Ligocki. 2022. "BB(6, 2) > 10↑↑15". https://www.sligocki.com/2022/06/21/bb-6-2-t15.html