1RB0LF_1RC1RA_1LD0RE_1LB1LD_---1RC_1RC1LA

From BusyBeaverWiki
Revision as of 20:40, 1 September 2024 by Sligocki (talk | contribs) (Write out proof a bit.)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

1RB0LF_1RC1RA_1LD0RE_1LB1LD_---1RC_1RC1LA (bbch)

Analysis by Shawn Ligocki:

A(a, b, c) = 0^inf 10^a <A 10^b 11^c 0^inf

A(a+1, b, c+1) -> A(a, b+2, c)

A(0, b, c+1) -> A(0, b+3, c)
A(0, b, 0)   -> A(b+1, 1, 1)

A(a+2, b, 0) -> A(a, 1, b+2)
A(1, b, 0) -> Halt(b+3)

Start: A(0, 0, 0)

Analysis by @rae:

(a,b,0) -> (3b-a+9,3,0) if 2<=a<=b+4
(a,b,0) -> (a-b-4,2b+5,0) if a>b+4
(1,b,0) -> halt

If we call the first rule the "reset" rule, then: Starting from a reset rule, b will follow the same trajectory each time, starting from 3 and increasing by repeatedly until . This sequences is . Let . Then if the next reset will be: . The question is whether we can ever reach . If then . Let be that next value of a.

for all

for all

So, if and then and this will continue to rule will apply repeatedly forever. Finally, starting from the blank tape, the trajectory gets to $$(0, 0, 0) \to (2719, 3, 0)$$ where . QED.