User:MrSolis/Playground

From BusyBeaverWiki
Revision as of 01:13, 16 February 2025 by MrSolis (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Unsolved problem:
Does Antihydra run forever?

1RB1RA_0LC1LE_1LD1LC_1LA0LB_1LF1RE_---0RA (bbch)

Artistic depiction of Antihydra by Jadeix

ANTIHYDRA PAGE REVAMP (WIP)

Antihydra is a BB(6) Cryptid. It is similar to Hydra in that it halts if and only if the sequence Hn+1=32Hn,H0=8, ever has more than twice the number of odd terms as the amount of even terms.

Analysis

Rules

Let A(a,b):=01a01bE>0. Then[1], A(a,2b)2a+3b2+12b+11A(a+2,3b+2),A(0,2b+1)3b2+9b10<F11013b0,A(a+1,2b+1)3b2+12b+5A(a,3b+3).

Proof

Consider the partial configuration P(m,n):=01mE>01n0. The configuration after two steps is 01m10A>1n+10. We note the following shift rule: A>1ss1sA> As a result, we get 01m101n+1A>0 after n+1 steps. Advancing two steps produces 01m101n+2<C0. A second shift rule is useful here: 1s<Cs<C1s This allows us to reach 01m10<C1n+20 in n+2 steps. Moving five more steps gets us to 01m2E>01n+30, which is the same configuration as P(m2,n+3). Accounting for the head movement creates the condition that m4. In summary: P(m,n)2n+12P(m2,n+3) if m4. With A(a,b) we have P(b,0). As a result, we can apply this rule 12b1 times (assuming b4), which creates two possible scenarios:

  1. If b0 (mod2), then in i=0(b/2)2(2×3i+12)=34b2+32b6 steps we arrive at P(2,32b3). The matching complete configuration is 01a011E>01(3b)/230. After 3b+4 steps this becomes 01a<C001(3b)/20, which then leads to 0<C1a001(3b)/20 in a steps. After five more steps, we reach 01E>1a+2001(3b)/20, from which another shift rule must be applied:E>1ss1sE>Doing so allows us to get the configuration 01a+3E>001(3b)/20 in a+2 steps. In six steps we have 01a+2011E>1(3b)/20, so we use the shift rule again, ending at 01a+201(3b)/2+2E>0, equal to A(a+2,32b+2), 32b steps later. This gives a total of 2a+34b2+6b+11 steps.
  2. If b1 (mod2), then in 34b2274 steps we arrive at P(3,3b92). The matching complete configuration is 01a0111E>01(3b9)/20. After 3b+2 steps this becomes 01a<F1101(3b3)/20. If a=0 then we have reached the undefined F0 transition with a total of 34b2+3b194 steps. Otherwise, continuing for six steps gives us 01a10111E>1(3b3)/20. We conclude with the configuration 01a101(3b+3)/2E>0, equal to A(a1,3b+32), in 3b32 steps. This gives a total of 34b2+92b14 steps.

The information above can be summarized as A(a,b){A(a+2,32b+2)if b2,b0(mod2);0<F1101(3b3)/20if b3,b1(mod2), and a=0;A(a1,3b+32)if b3,b1(mod2), and a>0. Substituting b2b for the first case and b2b+1 for the other two yields the final result.

Trajectory

11 steps are required to enter the configuration A(0,4) before the Collatz-like rules are repeatedly applied. Here are the first few iterations: A(0,4)47A(2,8)111A(4,14)250A(6,23)500A(5,36)1209A(7,56) The halting problems for Antihydra and Hydra are connected by the Hydra function, so the heuristic argument suggesting that machine is probviously nonhalting can be applied here. After 231 rule steps, we have b=1073720884[1], so this machine, if treated as a random process, has an extremely minuscule chance of ever halting.

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 S. Ligocki, "BB(6) is Hard (Antihydra)" (2024). Accessed 22 July 2024.