PLUSMINUS: Difference between revisions
→Explanation: typo |
m Error fixed |
||
| Line 127: | Line 127: | ||
|8 | |8 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|<nowiki>Halt (|010010| | |<nowiki>Halt (i>|010010|)</nowiki> | ||
|9 | |9 | ||
|} | |} | ||
Essentially, P(n) takes the “running maximum” of p(n), so it is no longer decreasing at points. Out of the first 1000 inputs, 49 were unresolved under a limit of 10000 executed instructions or 2 million bits of string storage. Said computation has established that P(1000)≥134. From the halting times section, the PLUSMINUS program “+++++-++++-+-++-“ corresponds to “1111101111010110” which is “64470” in decimal. It takes 31441 “steps” to halt. Therefore p(64470)=31442 (remembering the “+1” as per p(n)’s definition) and hence P(64470)≥31442. | Essentially, P(n) takes the “running maximum” of p(n), so it is no longer decreasing at points. Out of the first 1000 inputs, 49 were unresolved under a limit of 10000 executed instructions or 2 million bits of string storage. Said computation has established that P(1000)≥134. From the halting times section, the PLUSMINUS program “+++++-++++-+-++-“ corresponds to “1111101111010110” which is “64470” in decimal. It takes 31441 “steps” to halt. Therefore p(64470)=31442 (remembering the “+1” as per p(n)’s definition) and hence P(64470)≥31442. | ||
Revision as of 18:38, 29 October 2026
PLUSMINUS is an esoteric programming language developed by Discord user Jack in 2026. It is a “string-based copy-automaton” that has only 2 commands, similar to its inspiration XigXag, an esoteric language developed in 2001 by Chris Pressey. Despite its extreme simplicity, its Turing Completeness is actually unknown.
Definition
For a non-empty finite string S under the binary alphabet {+,-}, on step i=(1,2,…)
- If the i-th symbol is +, copy the first i-1 symbols and append them to the end.
- If the i-th symbol is -, delete the first i-1 symbols.
i never resets and advances each time. HALT when i>length(S).
Trace Example
| Program Evolution | i |
|---|---|
| +-++- (starting S) | N/A |
| +-++- (nothing exists leftward) | 1 |
| -++- | 2 |
| -++--+ | 3 |
| --+ | 4 |
| HALT (length(S)>3, 5>3) | 5 |
Halting characteristics for these programs include the following:
- The singular + halts
- ++…++ (with at least 2 +’s) never halts
- The program consisting of only - always halts for any length.
Known Halting Time Champions
Below are PLUSMINUS programs and their corresponding number of “steps” until halting:
+=1
-+=3
-++=4
-+++=7
++++-=15
+++-++=18
++++---=20
--++++++=32
++++-+--+=44
+++++-+-+-=196
+++++-+--+-=913
+++-++++++-+=5940
+-++++++--++-=728
++++-++++++---=608
-+-++++++---+++=2582
+++++-++++-+-++-=31441
Relation to BB(n)
We can concisely define 2 Busy Beaver functions that both include the definition of PLUSMINUS in their definition using just over 300 characters. This version uses 1 and 0 instead of + and - for simplicities sake. It is defined as follows:
Let the length of x be denoted by |x|.
For n ∈ ℕ, convert n to its binary form B. Assuming i=(1,2,…):
If its i-th symbol is 1, copy its first i-1 symbols and append them to the end. If else, delete its first i-1 symbols.
i never resets and advances each time. Halt when i>|B|.
- p(n)=min(i) such that i>|B| (or 0 if the process never halts)
- P(n)=max(p(k)) for k=(1,…,n)
Explanation
The list of champions above details executed steps, while p(n) returns the instruction index when halting is detected. It is a minor difference, but should be noted since p(n)=(number of executed steps)+1. If p(n) never halts for specific n, the output is 0. Halting in PLUSMINUS has not been proven undecidable/decidable. Also, ordinary binary integers never start with 0, so P(n) actually excludes all programs that begin as such. Step-by-step, p(53) is calculated as follows:
n=53. 53 in binary is “110101”. This is how 110101 evolves over time:
| Program Evolution | i |
|---|---|
| 110101 (start) | N/A |
| 110101 (nothing is appended) | 1 |
| 1101011 | 2 |
| 01011 | 3 |
| 01001011 | 4 |
| 01011 | 5 |
| 0101101011 | 6 |
| 0101101011 | 7 |
| 010010 | 8 |
| Halt (i>|010010|) | 9 |
Essentially, P(n) takes the “running maximum” of p(n), so it is no longer decreasing at points. Out of the first 1000 inputs, 49 were unresolved under a limit of 10000 executed instructions or 2 million bits of string storage. Said computation has established that P(1000)≥134. From the halting times section, the PLUSMINUS program “+++++-++++-+-++-“ corresponds to “1111101111010110” which is “64470” in decimal. It takes 31441 “steps” to halt. Therefore p(64470)=31442 (remembering the “+1” as per p(n)’s definition) and hence P(64470)≥31442.