Skelet 26: Difference between revisions
→Skelet 15: expanded section |
→Analysis by Shawn Ligocki: adjusted heading level (as Skelet 15 doesn't have its own analysis section due to equivalence) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Skelet 26 was proven to be non-halting in January 2024 by int-y1 and meithecatte.<ref name="Forum2615">https://discuss.bbchallenge.org/t/skelet-26-and-15-do-not-halt-coq-proof/183</ref> | Skelet 26 was proven to be non-halting in January 2024 by int-y1 and meithecatte.<ref name="Forum2615">https://discuss.bbchallenge.org/t/skelet-26-and-15-do-not-halt-coq-proof/183</ref> | ||
== Analysis by [[User:Sligocki|Shawn Ligocki]] == | |||
https://www.sligocki.com/2023/02/05/shift-overflow.html | https://www.sligocki.com/2023/02/05/shift-overflow.html | ||
<pre> | <pre> | ||
Revision as of 18:29, 7 March 2026
1RB1LD_1RC0RB_1LA1RC_1LE0LA_1LC--- (bbch), called Skelet #26, was one of Skelet's 43 holdouts and one of the last holdouts in BB(5). It is a Shift overflow counter and has an individual proof of non-halting in Coq-BB5.[1] It is equivalent to Skelet 15.
Skelet 26 was proven to be non-halting in January 2024 by int-y1 and meithecatte.[2]
Analysis by Shawn Ligocki
https://www.sligocki.com/2023/02/05/shift-overflow.html
L(2k) = L(k) 0000
L(2k+1) = L(k) 0001
D(n, a, m) = L(n) 000 <C 101a R(m)
E(n, a, m) = L(n) 00 <C 101a R(m)
F(n, a, m) = L(n) 0 <C 101a R(m)
G(n, a, m) = L(n) <C 101a R(m)
D(n, a, m) -> D(n+1, a, m+1) (if b(m) > 1)
L(n) 000 <C -> L(n+1) 000 B>
1000 <C -> <C 1111
0000 <C -> 1000 B>
E> R(n) -> <C R(n+1)
E> 11 -> 11 E>
E> 10 -> <C 11
11 <C -> <C 10
B> 1010 -> 1111 E>
1111 <C -> <C 1010
B> 1011 -> 0111 E>
0111 <C -> <C 1011
D(n-1, 0, 2^k - 1) -> E(n, 1, 2^k)
0 1111 E> 11^k 0 -> <C 1011 10^k 11
E(n, a, m) -> E(n', 1, m') (if b(m) > n) (n' < n)
0100 0000^k <C 101a R(m) -> 0100 1000^k <C 101a R(m + 2^k - 1)
0100 1000^k <C 101a R(m + 2^k - 1) -> <C 1011 10^2k 11 1a R(m + 2^k - 1)
D(n-1, 1, 2^k - 1) -> G(2n, 0, 2^{k-1})
1000 0000^n 0111 E> 11^m+1 0 -> 01 0000^n+1 <C 1010 10^m 11
G(n, a, m) -> E(n', a', m') (if b(m) > n) (n' < n)
01 0000^k <C 101a R(m) -> <C 10 10^2k 11 1a R(m + 2^k - 1)
Start -> D(0, 0, 11) @ Step 85
Skelet 15
1RB---_1RC1LB_1LD1RE_1LB0LD_1RA0RC (bbch), also called Skelet #15, was proven to be non-halting together with Skelet 26 in January 2024 by int-y1 and meithecatte[2] and has an individual proof of non-halting in Coq-BB5.[3] It is a permutation of Skelet 26, achieved by starting Skelet 26 in state E and then normalizing to TNF.[4] Its analysis is equivalent to that of Skelet 26, starting in configuration D(0, 0, 1) after 21 steps.[4]