Linear-Inequality Affine Transformation Automata: Difference between revisions
→Formal Definition: Move Turing complete stuff to a new section and some general format cleanup. |
Add headnote noting flux |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Linear-Inequality Affine Transformation Automata (LIATA)''' are a model for computation based upon applying affine transformations to vectors based on cases defined by linear inequalities. They are a generalization of the rules for [[BMO1]] and were proven to be Turing complete. | <blockquote>Note: This article is currently in flux as we investigate previous literature on the topic shared by @savask: https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1239205785913790465/1422997913558323392</blockquote>'''Linear-Inequality Affine Transformation Automata (LIATA)''' are a model for computation based upon applying affine transformations to vectors based on cases defined by linear inequalities. They are a generalization of the rules for [[BMO1]] and were proven to be Turing complete. | ||
== Example == | == Example == |
Revision as of 18:59, 1 October 2025
Note: This article is currently in flux as we investigate previous literature on the topic shared by @savask: https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1239205785913790465/1422997913558323392
Linear-Inequality Affine Transformation Automata (LIATA) are a model for computation based upon applying affine transformations to vectors based on cases defined by linear inequalities. They are a generalization of the rules for BMO1 and were proven to be Turing complete.
Example
An example of a LIATA are the rules for BMO1:where is undefined. BMO1 halts iff there exists k such that is undefined (in other words for some n).
This is a 2-dimension, 2-case LIATA. The 2 dimensions are the parameters a,b and the two cases are the and rows. For each case the parameters are transformed via an affine transformation.
Formal Definition
A n-dimension, k-case LIATA is a piecewise defined partial function :Where each is an affine function and each is a "linear inequality condition" (defined below) such that for all at most one condition applies. If none of the conditions apply to , we say that it halts on that configuration.
Let a linear inequality term be any equation of the form where is a linear function and ~ is replaced by any (in)equality relation (=,<,≤,>,≥). Then let a linear inequality condition be any combination of linear inequality terms using logical AND, OR and NOT operations.
So, for example, the following are all linear inequality conditions:
- represented formally as
- represented formally as
- (note that we allow equalities as well)
Given a LIATA f, we say that it halts in k steps starting from configuration iff is undefined.
Turing Complete
LIATA are Turing complete. This has been proven by implementing Minsky machines as LIATA:
- @Bard's proved that 3-dim LIATA are Turing complete: Discord link
- @star's proved that 2-dim LIATA are Turing complete: Discord link
- In progress: Shawn Ligocki is working on a proof that 2-case LIATA are Turing complete: Discord link