Probvious: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
(Cleanup some confusing sentences) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
The word appears in Conway's article a few times as a way of forming conjectures about a [[Collatz-like]] function that had already been investigated in the past.<ref>Atkin, A. O. L. "Problem 63-13." <i>SIAM Review</i> 8, no. 2 (1966): 234–36. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2028281</ref><ref>Guy, Richard K. "Don’t Try to Solve These Problems!" <i>The American Mathematical Monthly</i> 90, no. 1 (1983): 35–41. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2975688</ref> This function, denoted <math>\mu(n)</math>, is defined as: | The word appears in Conway's article a few times as a way of forming conjectures about a [[Collatz-like]] function that had already been investigated in the past.<ref>Atkin, A. O. L. "Problem 63-13." <i>SIAM Review</i> 8, no. 2 (1966): 234–36. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2028281</ref><ref>Guy, Richard K. "Don’t Try to Solve These Problems!" <i>The American Mathematical Monthly</i> 90, no. 1 (1983): 35–41. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2975688</ref> This function, denoted <math>\mu(n)</math>, is defined as: | ||
<math display="block">\begin{array}{lll}\mu(2n)&=&3n\\ \mu(4n+1)&=&3n+1\\ \mu(4n+3)&=&3n+2\end{array}\Rightarrow\begin{array}{lll}\mu^{-1}(3n)&=&2n\\ \mu^{-1}(3n+1)&=&4n+1\\ \mu^{-1}(3n+2)&=&4n+3\end{array}</math> | <math display="block">\begin{array}{lll}\mu(2n)&=&3n\\ \mu(4n+1)&=&3n+1\\ \mu(4n+3)&=&3n+2\end{array}\Rightarrow\begin{array}{lll}\mu^{-1}(3n)&=&2n\\ \mu^{-1}(3n+1)&=&4n+1\\ \mu^{-1}(3n+2)&=&4n+3\end{array}</math> | ||
Conway first uses "probvious" to describe the idea that the sequences of iterates <math>(\cdots,8,\mu(8),\mu^2(8),\cdots)</math> and <math>(\cdots,14,\mu(14),\mu^2(14),\cdots)</math> diverge to infinity. Likewise, there exist [[Turing machines]] for which determining whether they halt requires solving a mathematical problem believed to be difficult | Conway first uses "probvious" to describe the idea that the sequences of iterates <math>(\cdots,8,\mu(8),\mu^2(8),\cdots)</math> and <math>(\cdots,14,\mu(14),\mu^2(14),\cdots)</math> diverge to infinity. | ||
Likewise, there exist [[Turing machines]] for which determining whether they halt requires solving a mathematical problem believed to be difficult (oftentimes a [[Collatz-like]] problem) but using probabilistic approximations of their functions suggests a clear solution. For example, Bigfoot and Hydra are probviously nonhalting because they simulate biased pseudo-random walks which (when interpreted as random) leave vanishingly small probabilities of ever halting. Similarly, machines such as [[Lucy's Moonlight]] and [[Mother of Giants]] are probviously halting because they simulate a sequence of pseudo-random coin flips, halting with a fixed probability on each trial. | |||
== References == | == References == | ||
<references /> | <references /> |
Revision as of 00:42, 8 March 2025
"Probvious" (a portmanteau of the words probabilistic and obvious) is an adjective used to express a high degree of confidence about a mathematical property or statement that is not known to be true. It was introduced by John Conway in an article discussing potentially unprovable statements.[1] The term has been used by bbchallenge contributors to describe the solutions to halting problems for Cryptids such as Bigfoot and Hydra.
Usage

The word appears in Conway's article a few times as a way of forming conjectures about a Collatz-like function that had already been investigated in the past.[2][3] This function, denoted , is defined as:
Likewise, there exist Turing machines for which determining whether they halt requires solving a mathematical problem believed to be difficult (oftentimes a Collatz-like problem) but using probabilistic approximations of their functions suggests a clear solution. For example, Bigfoot and Hydra are probviously nonhalting because they simulate biased pseudo-random walks which (when interpreted as random) leave vanishingly small probabilities of ever halting. Similarly, machines such as Lucy's Moonlight and Mother of Giants are probviously halting because they simulate a sequence of pseudo-random coin flips, halting with a fixed probability on each trial.
References
- ↑ John Conway. "On Unsettleable Arithmetical Problems". 2017. https://doi.org/10.4169/amer.math.monthly.120.03.192
- ↑ Atkin, A. O. L. "Problem 63-13." SIAM Review 8, no. 2 (1966): 234–36. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2028281
- ↑ Guy, Richard K. "Don’t Try to Solve These Problems!" The American Mathematical Monthly 90, no. 1 (1983): 35–41. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2975688