TMBR: July 2026: Difference between revisions

From BusyBeaverWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Remove BBB(4) proof progress which I think belongs together in the big Aug announcement
→BB Adjacent: Edit down some of the BB Adjacent section
Line 13: Line 13:


* [[SKI Calculus]]:
* [[SKI Calculus]]:
** On July 3, Δ⁵ discovered a new champion for Ξ₀<sub>SK</sub>(12).<sup>[https://wiki.bbchallenge.org/w/index.php?title=SKI_Calculus&diff=next&oldid=7894]</sup>
** Δ⁵ discovered several new champions for Ξ₀<sub>SK</sub>(12),<sup>[https://wiki.bbchallenge.org/w/index.php?title=SKI_Calculus&diff=next&oldid=7894]</sup>, Ξ₀<sub>SK</sub>(14),<sup>[https://wiki.bbchallenge.org/w/index.php?title=SKI_Calculus&diff=next&oldid=7968]</sup> Ξ₀(12), Ξ₀<sub>SK</sub>(15),<sup>[https://wiki.bbchallenge.org/w/index.php?title=SKI_Calculus&diff=next&oldid=7996]</sup> and Ξ₀<sub>SK</sub>(16).<sup>[https://wiki.bbchallenge.org/w/index.php?title=SKI_Calculus&diff=next&oldid=8083]</sup>
** On July 10, Δ⁵ discovered new champions for Ξ₀(12) and Ξ₀<sub>SK</sub>(14).<sup>[https://wiki.bbchallenge.org/w/index.php?title=SKI_Calculus&diff=next&oldid=7968]</sup>
** On July 19, Δ⁵ discovered new tetrational champions for Ξ₀(12), Ξ₀<sub>SK</sub>(15), Ξ₀<sub>SK</sub>(16), and Ξ₀<sub>SK</sub>(17).<sup>[https://wiki.bbchallenge.org/w/index.php?title=SKI_Calculus&diff=next&oldid=7996]</sup>
** On July 27, Δ⁵ discovered a new pentational champion for Ξ₀<sub>BCKW</sub>(7) and new hexational champions for Ξ₀<sub>BCKW</sub>(8) and Ξ₀<sub>BCKW</sub>(9).<sup>[https://wiki.bbchallenge.org/w/index.php?title=SKI_Calculus&diff=next&oldid=8050]</sup>
** On July 27, Δ⁵ discovered a new pentational champion for Ξ₀<sub>BCKW</sub>(7) and new hexational champions for Ξ₀<sub>BCKW</sub>(8) and Ξ₀<sub>BCKW</sub>(9).<sup>[https://wiki.bbchallenge.org/w/index.php?title=SKI_Calculus&diff=next&oldid=8050]</sup>
** On the same day, Δ⁵ tweaked the Ξ₀<sub>SK</sub>(16) champion, improving the bound by roughly 33%.<sup>[https://wiki.bbchallenge.org/w/index.php?title=SKI_Calculus&diff=next&oldid=8083]</sup>
** On the same day, Δ⁵ discovered a new pentational champion for Ξ₀<sub>SK</sub>(22), and new hexational champions for Ξ₀<sub>SK</sub>(23), Ξ₀<sub>SK</sub>(24), and Ξ₀<sub>SK</sub>(25).<sup>[https://wiki.bbchallenge.org/w/index.php?title=SKI_Calculus&diff=next&oldid=8087]</sup>
** On the same day, Δ⁵ discovered a new pentational champion for Ξ₀<sub>SK</sub>(22), and new hexational champions for Ξ₀<sub>SK</sub>(23), Ξ₀<sub>SK</sub>(24), and Ξ₀<sub>SK</sub>(25).<sup>[https://wiki.bbchallenge.org/w/index.php?title=SKI_Calculus&diff=next&oldid=8087]</sup>
** On July 28, Δ⁵ discovered a new pentational champion for Ξ₀<sub>SK</sub>(17).<sup>[https://wiki.bbchallenge.org/w/index.php?title=SKI_Calculus&diff=next&oldid=8100]</sup>
** On July 28, Δ⁵ discovered a new pentational champion for Ξ₀<sub>SK</sub>(17).<sup>[https://wiki.bbchallenge.org/w/index.php?title=SKI_Calculus&diff=next&oldid=8100]</sup>
Line 23: Line 20:
** On July 16, Azerty discovered a logical leap in a claimed equivalence,<sup>[https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1484108791636033659/1527291163823050803]</sup> prompting another re-enumeration of BBCS(11), leaving the same 1 holdout.<sup>[https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1484108791636033659/1527291256198402179]</sup> This holdout was previously proven non-halting by sheep on May 17,<sup>[https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1484108791636033659/1554807350811168868]</sup> racheline on July 8,<sup>[https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1484108791636033659/1524403079867535440]</sup> and Tobias B on July 11.<sup>[https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1484108791636033659/1525470062515978252]</sup>
** On July 16, Azerty discovered a logical leap in a claimed equivalence,<sup>[https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1484108791636033659/1527291163823050803]</sup> prompting another re-enumeration of BBCS(11), leaving the same 1 holdout.<sup>[https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1484108791636033659/1527291256198402179]</sup> This holdout was previously proven non-halting by sheep on May 17,<sup>[https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1484108791636033659/1554807350811168868]</sup> racheline on July 8,<sup>[https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1484108791636033659/1524403079867535440]</sup> and Tobias B on July 11.<sup>[https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1484108791636033659/1525470062515978252]</sup>
* [[General Recursive Function]]:
* [[General Recursive Function]]:
** On July 16, Shawn Ligocki found a size 13 version of a notable size 16 non-halting function which tested the divisibility of tetrahedral numbers.<sup>[https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1447627603698647303/1527405134857113650]</sup>
** On July 16, Shawn Ligocki reduced the size 16 M(PRF) holdout list to 15 and proved those remaining 15 non-halting by hand, proving that the max value is 6.<sup>[https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1447627603698647303/1527407138102841446]</sup> He shared what appears to be the [[General Recursive Function#Hardest Size 13 (Triangular Divisibility)|hardest size 15 program]] which depends on logic for divisibility of triangular numbers.<sup>[https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1447627603698647303/1527405134857113650]</sup>
** On the same day, Shawn Ligocki proved that the largest number attained by a halting function of the form M(PRF) of size 13 is 6.<sup>[https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1447627603698647303/1527407138102841446][https://wiki.bbchallenge.org/w/index.php?title=General_Recursive_Function&oldid=8033]</sup>


* [[Lambda Calculus]]:
* [[Lambda Calculus]]:

Revision as of 21:11, 8 November 2026

Prev: June 2026 This Month in Beaver Research Next: August 2026

This edition of TMBR is in progress and has not yet been released. Please add any notes you think may be relevant (including in the form a of a TODO with a link to any relevant Discord discussion).

General

  • Verification of BB(5) = 47,176,870 in Lean:
    • On July 14, Marcelo Fornet used Claude AI to translate the proof of BB(5) = 47,176,870 to Lean, save for two machines: Skelet #1, and Skelet #17.[1]
    • On July 16, the non-halting proof for Skelet #17 was translated to Lean.[2]
    • On July 25, the non-halting proof for Skelet #1 was translated to Lean, thus completing the proof of BB(5) = 47,176,870 in Lean.[3]

BB Adjacent

  • SKI Calculus:
    • Δ⁵ discovered several new champions for Ξ₀SK(12),[4], Ξ₀SK(14),[5] Ξ₀(12), Ξ₀SK(15),[6] and Ξ₀SK(16).[7]
    • On July 27, Δ⁵ discovered a new pentational champion for Ξ₀BCKW(7) and new hexational champions for Ξ₀BCKW(8) and Ξ₀BCKW(9).[8]
    • On the same day, Δ⁵ discovered a new pentational champion for Ξ₀SK(22), and new hexational champions for Ξ₀SK(23), Ξ₀SK(24), and Ξ₀SK(25).[9]
    • On July 28, Δ⁵ discovered a new pentational champion for Ξ₀SK(17).[10]
  • CounterScript:
    • On July 16, Azerty discovered a logical leap in a claimed equivalence,[11] prompting another re-enumeration of BBCS(11), leaving the same 1 holdout.[12] This holdout was previously proven non-halting by sheep on May 17,[13] racheline on July 8,[14] and Tobias B on July 11.[15]
  • General Recursive Function:
    • On July 16, Shawn Ligocki reduced the size 16 M(PRF) holdout list to 15 and proved those remaining 15 non-halting by hand, proving that the max value is 6.[16] He shared what appears to be the hardest size 15 program which depends on logic for divisibility of triangular numbers.[17]
  • Lambda Calculus:
    • On July 20, BBλ(40) was solved, showing that BBλ(40) ≈ 10↑↑↑16. BBλ(40) is the first solved domain in any non-trivial BB variant to reach pentational values.
  • Post Tag System
    • On July 21, Shawn Ligocki introduced the Busy Beaver function for Post Tag Systems, BBPT(n),[18] and provided champions for BBPT(n) for sizes 7 to 11.[19]
    • On the same day, Shawn Ligocki shared holdout lists for tag systems with sizes less than 12.[20]
    • On July 22, Shawn Ligocki proved the values of BBPT(n) for sizes 1 to 6, and shared a set of 9 holdouts with sizes less than 9.[21]
    • On July 24, sheep discovered a supposedly "halting" tag system of size 11, with a mechanism similar to cryptids.[22] However, after a careful simulation by Shawn Ligocki,[23] it was realized that the system was an actual cryptid,[24] showing BBPT(11) is hard.
  • Wang Tiles
    • On July 22, AlephSquirrel introduced the Busy Beaver function for Wang Tiles, BBWT(n), and proved the values of BBWT(1) and BBWT(2).[25]
    • On the same day, mathmasterzach established the lower bound BBWT(n) ≥ n.[26]
    • On July 23, sheep rediscovered literature[27] from Emmanuel Jeandel and Michael Rao that implies BBWT(10) ≥ 212, and is decidable.[28]
    • On July 24, AlephSquirrel proved BBWT(3) = 3.
    • On July 25, AlephSquirrel proved BBWT(4) = 4.[29]
    • On the same day, AlephSquirrel found a new BBWT(5) champion.[30]
    • On July 26, Shawn Ligocki noted that the behavior of the BBWT(5) champion could be extended to establish the lower bound BBWT(n) ≥ 2n - 4.[31]

Holdouts

BB Holdout Reduction by Domain
Domain Previous Holdout Count New Holdout Count Holdout Reduction % Reduction
BB(6) 1,094 1,064 30 2.74%
BB(4,3) 4,784,443 4,747,566 36,877 0.77%
  • BB(6)
    • On July 1, mxdys solved 4 holdouts in rocq.[32][33]
    • On July 2, mxdys solved another holdout in rocq.[34]
    • On July 3, mxdys solved another holdout in rocq with the help of an LLM.
    • On July 28, prurq found a TM to halt. This was verified by mxdys in rocq two days later together with another machine.
    • On the same day, mxdys released a new holdouts list of 1,064 machines up to equivalence, a 2.74% reduction compared to the previous holdouts list.
  • BB(4,3)
    • Andrew Ducharme reduced the number of holdouts from 4,784,443 to 4,747,566, a 0.77% reduction.[35][36]
  • BB(2,5)
    • On July 30, prurq simulated a holdout to halting.[37]
  • BB(2,7)
    • Terry Ligocki enumerated 180K more subtasks, increasing the number of holdouts to 2,185,010,519. A total of 700K subtasks out of the 1 million subtasks (or 70%) have been enumerated.