TMBR: July 2026: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
done, finished. hopefully |
and there's this |
||
| Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
* [[BB(4,3)]] | * [[BB(4,3)]] | ||
** Andrew Ducharme reduced the number of holdouts from 4,784,443 to '''4,747,566''', a '''0.77%''' reduction.<sup>[https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1084047886494470185/1522168741922607164][https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1084047886494470185/1530496818155229294]</sup> | ** Andrew Ducharme reduced the number of holdouts from 4,784,443 to '''4,747,566''', a '''0.77%''' reduction.<sup>[https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1084047886494470185/1522168741922607164][https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1084047886494470185/1530496818155229294]</sup> | ||
* [[BB(2,5)]] | |||
** On July 30, prurq simulated a holdout to halting.<sup>[https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1259770421046411285/1532442006759018599]</sup> | |||
*[[BB(2,7)]] | *[[BB(2,7)]] | ||
**Terry Ligocki enumerated 180K more subtasks, increasing the number of holdouts to '''2,185,010,519'''. A total of 700K subtasks out of the 1 million subtasks (or '''70%''') have been enumerated. | **Terry Ligocki enumerated 180K more subtasks, increasing the number of holdouts to '''2,185,010,519'''. A total of 700K subtasks out of the 1 million subtasks (or '''70%''') have been enumerated. | ||
[[Category:This Month in Beaver Research|2026-07]] | [[Category:This Month in Beaver Research|2026-07]] | ||
Revision as of 18:03, 3 October 2026
| Prev: June 2026 | This Month in Beaver Research | Next: August 2026 |
This edition of TMBR is in progress and has not yet been released. Please add any notes you think may be relevant (including in the form a of a TODO with a link to any relevant Discord discussion).
General
- Verification of BB(5) = 47,176,870 in Lean:
- On July 14, Marcelo Fornet used Claude AI to translate the proof of BB(5) = 47,176,870 to Lean, save for two machines: Skelet #1, and Skelet #17.[1]
- On July 16, the non-halting proof for Skelet #17 was translated to Lean.[2]
- On July 25, the non-halting proof for Skelet #1 was translated to Lean, thus completing the proof of BB(5) = 47,176,870 in Lean.[3]
- Proof of BBB(4) = 32,779,478:
BB Adjacent
- SKI Calculus:
- On July 3, Δ⁵ discovered a new champion for Ξ₀SK(12).[6]
- On July 10, Δ⁵ discovered new champions for Ξ₀(12) and Ξ₀SK(14).[7]
- On July 19, Δ⁵ discovered new tetrational champions for Ξ₀(12), Ξ₀SK(15), Ξ₀SK(16), and Ξ₀SK(17).[8]
- On July 27, Δ⁵ discovered a new pentational champion for Ξ₀BCKW(7) and new hexational champions for Ξ₀BCKW(8) and Ξ₀BCKW(9).[9]
- On the same day, Δ⁵ tweaked the Ξ₀SK(16) champion, improving the bound by roughly 33%.[10]
- On the same day, Δ⁵ discovered a new pentational champion for Ξ₀SK(22), and new hexational champions for Ξ₀SK(23), Ξ₀SK(24), and Ξ₀SK(25).[11]
- On July 28, Δ⁵ discovered a new pentational champion for Ξ₀SK(17).[12]
- CounterScript:
- General Recursive Function:
- Lambda Calculus:
- On July 20, BBλ(40) was solved, showing that BBλ(40) ≈ 10↑↑↑16. BBλ(40) is the first solved domain in any non-trivial BB variant to reach pentational values.
- Post Tag System
- On July 21, Shawn Ligocki introduced the Busy Beaver function for Post Tag Systems, BBPT(n),[21] and provided champions for BBWT(n) for sizes 7 to 11.[22]
- On the same day, Shawn Ligocki shared holdout lists for tag systems with sizes less than 12.[23]
- On July 22, Shawn Ligocki proved the values of BBPT(n) for sizes 1 to 6, and shared a set of 9 holdouts with sizes less than 9.[24]
- On July 24, sheep discovered a supposedly "halting" tag system of size 11, with a mechanism similar to cryptids.[25] However, after a careful simulation by Shawn Ligocki,[26] it was realized that the system was an actual cryptid,[27] showing BBPT(11) is hard.
- Wang Tiles
- On July 22, AlephSquirrel introduced the Busy Beaver function for Wang Tiles, BBWT(n), and proved the values of BBWT(1) and BBWT(2).[28]
- On the same day, mathmasterzach established the lower bound BBWT(n) ≥ n.[29]
- On July 23, sheep rediscovered literature[30] from Emmanuel Jeandel and Michael Rao that implied BBWT(10) ≥ 212, and was decidable.[31]
- On July 24, AlephSquirrel proved BBWT(3) = 3.
- On July 25, AlephSquirrel proved BBWT(4) = 4.[32]
- On the same day, AlephSquirrel found a new BBWT(5) champion.[33]
- On July 26, Shawn Ligocki noted that the behavior of the BBWT(5) champion could be extended to establish the lower bound BBWT(n) ≥ 2n - 4.[34]
Holdouts
| Domain | Previous Holdout Count | New Holdout Count | Holdout Reduction | % Reduction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BB(6) | 1,094 | 1,064 | 30 | 2.74% |
| BB(4,3) | 4,784,443 | 4,747,566 | 36,877 | 0.77% |
- BB(6)
- On July 1, mxdys solved 4 holdouts in rocq.[35][36]
- On July 2, mxdys solved another holdout in rocq.[37]
- On July 3, mxdys solved another holdout in rocq with the help of an LLM.
- On July 28, prurq found a TM to halt. This was verified by mxdys in rocq two days later together with another machine.
- On the same day, mxdys released a new holdouts list of 1,064 machines up to equivalence, a 2.74% reduction compared to the previous holdouts list.
- BB(4,3)
- BB(2,5)
- On July 30, prurq simulated a holdout to halting.[40]
- BB(2,7)
- Terry Ligocki enumerated 180K more subtasks, increasing the number of holdouts to 2,185,010,519. A total of 700K subtasks out of the 1 million subtasks (or 70%) have been enumerated.