SKI Calculus: Difference between revisions

From BusyBeaverWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Δ⁵ (talk | contribs)
Polygon (talk | contribs)
Linked Brainfuck
Line 177: Line 177:


== See Also ==
== See Also ==
[https://web.archive.org/web/20250217071017/https://komiamiko.me/math/ordinals/2020/06/21/ski-numerals.html Lower bounds of this function] (archived)
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20250217071017/https://komiamiko.me/math/ordinals/2020/06/21/ski-numerals.html Lower bounds of this function] (archived)
 
* [https://dallaylaen.github.io/ski-interpreter/ SKI interpreter]
[https://dallaylaen.github.io/ski-interpreter/ SKI interpreter]
* [[Brainfuck]]


[[Category:Functions]]
[[Category:Functions]]

Revision as of 19:44, 22 May 2026

A SKI calculus program is a binary tree where the leaves are combinators, the three symbols S, K, I. Using parentheses to notate the tree, a simple example of a SKI program is (((SK)S)((KI)S)). We can omit parentheses by assuming they are left-binding by default, so we simplify our program to SKS(KIS).

Like lambda calculus, SKI calculus has a process called beta-reduction. We change the tree according to any reducible redex.

Ix -> x Kfx -> f Sfgx -> fx(gx)

Note that xyz represent any valid trees, not just single combinators. We repeat this process and we say it terminates if the combinator cannot be beta-reduced.

Busy Beaver for SKI calculus (BB_SKI) is a variation of the Busy Beaver problem for lambda calculus. BB_SKI(n) is defined as the size of the largest output of a terminating program of size n.

Champions

n Value Champion Discovered by
1 = 1 S
2 = 2 SS
3 = 3 SSS
4 = 4 SSSS
5 = 6 SSS(SS)
6 = 17 SSS(SI)S
7 ≥ 40 S(SS)S(SS)S
8 ≥ 41 SII(S(S(SS)))S
9 ≥ 79 SII(SS(SSS))S
10 ≥ 164 SII(SS(SS(SS)))S
11 ≥ 681 SII(SS(SS(SSS)))S
12 ≥ 196606 S(S(SI))I(S(S(KS)K)I)K
13 > 2^2^2^21 S(S(SSS)I)I(S(S(KS)K)I)
14 > 2^^18 S(S(S(SSS))I)I(S(S(KS)K)I)
15 > 2^^2^128 SSK(S(S(KS)K)I)(S(SSSI)I)
16 > 2^^2^2^2^2^21 SSK(S(S(KS)K)I)(S(S(SSS)I)I)
17 > 2^^^2^128 S(SSK(S(SSSI)I))I(S(S(KS)K)I)
18 > 2{65535}4 S(S(SI))I(S(K(S(SI(K(S(S(KS)K)I)))))K)
19 > 2{65535}4 S(S(S(SI)))I(S(K(S(SI(K(S(S(KS)K)I)))))K)
20 > Graham's Number S(S(S(SI)))I(S(K(S(SS(K(K(S(S(KS)K)I))))))K)

SK calculus

We can remove the I combinator and replace it by (SKS), (SKK) or any (SKx). These terms have a straightforward binary encoding where (prefix) application is 1, K=00, and S=01. Since n combinators take n-1 applications to combine, their code length is 2n + n-1 = 3n-1 bits.

Champions

n bits Value Champion Discovered by
1 2 = 1 S
2 5 = 2 SS
3 8 = 3 SSS
4 11 = 4 SSSS
5 14 = 6 SSS(SS)
6 17 = 10 SSS(SS)S
7 20 ≥ 40 S(SS)S(SS)S
8 23 ≥ 41 S(S(SS)S(SS)S)
9 26 ≥ 42 S(S(S(SS)S(SS)S))
10 29 ≥ 66 SS(SSS)(SS(SS))S
11 32 ≥ 79 SS(SSS)(SS(SSS))S
12 35 ≥ 164 SS(SKK)(SS)(SS(SS))S
13 38 ≥ 681 SS(SKK)(SS)(SS(SSS))S
14 41 ≥ 1530 SS(SKK)(SS)(SS(SS(SS)))S
15 44 ≥ 7811 SS(SKK)(SS)(SS(SS(SSS)))S

Oracles

We can extend BB_SKI with oracles, making it stronger than BB. For example, we can add an oracle combinator O where Ofxy=x iff for all z fz=z, and y otherwise. The resulting busy beaver, known as the Xi function, is estimated to be faster-growing than ordinal oracle busy beavers with the oracle degree <= w_1^CK. A further extension would be to add another oracle, O’, where O’fxy=x iff f is well-founded, and y otherwise, where a term is well-founded iff there is no infinitely nested outermost-redex oracle calls. The resulting busy beaver is called Xi_2.

See Also