TMBR: April 2026: Difference between revisions

From BusyBeaverWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Polygon (talk | contribs)
m BB Adjacent: BB\ --> BBλ
Polygon (talk | contribs)
m BB Adjacent: spacing
Line 11: Line 11:
**Katelyn Doucette [https://github.com/Laturas/FractranVisualizer created a visualizer for Fractran space-time diagrams].
**Katelyn Doucette [https://github.com/Laturas/FractranVisualizer created a visualizer for Fractran space-time diagrams].
**Racheline created a size 29 program that is tetrational (depending on what we consider tetrational), see [https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1438019511155691521/1489361701727109330 Discord].
**Racheline created a size 29 program that is tetrational (depending on what we consider tetrational), see [https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1438019511155691521/1489361701727109330 Discord].
**Racheline also created <math>f_\omega</math>programs starting from size 86, see [https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1438019511155691521/1489473702000201789 Discord].
**Racheline also created <math>f_\omega</math> programs starting from size 86, see [https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1438019511155691521/1489473702000201789 Discord].
**Finally, Racheline created <math>f_{\omega + 1}</math>programs from size 95, meaning Graham's number fits under size 100. She predicts that one probably exists under size 40, and that it shouldn't be hard to reduce it to at least 60.
**Finally, Racheline created <math>f_{\omega + 1}</math> programs from size 95, meaning Graham's number fits under size 100. She predicts that one probably exists under size 40, and that it shouldn't be hard to reduce it to at least 60.
* [[General Recursive Function]]
* [[General Recursive Function]]
** 3 Apr: Jacob Mandelson proved the values up to BBµ(7).<sup>[https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1447627603698647303/1489782558446321677 <nowiki>[3]</nowiki>]</sup>
** 3 Apr: Jacob Mandelson proved the values up to BBµ(7).<sup>[https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1447627603698647303/1489782558446321677 <nowiki>[3]</nowiki>]</sup>

Revision as of 13:20, 3 May 2026

Prev: March 2026 This Month in Beaver Research Next: May 2026

This edition of TMBR is in progress and has not yet been released. Please add any notes you think may be relevant (including in the form a of a TODO with a link to any relevant Discord discussion).

This Month in Beaver Research for April 2026. This month, a new Cryptid was discovered in BB(6) by Discord user sheep, and BMO 8 was added to BMO. Two informally proven machines were formalised into Rocq in BB(2,5), and Katelyn Doucette created a visualizer for Fractran space-time diagrams. BBf(22) has been solved except for the Fenrir-family[1], enumeration of BBf(23) will take roughly 10 days.[2] There was a 40% reduction in BB(4,3), and we also shot below 18 million holdouts for BB(7).

BB Adjacent

Space-time diagram of Space Needle in Fractran.
Space-time diagram of Space Needle in Fractran.

Holdouts

BB Holdout Reduction by Domain
Domain Previous Holdout Count New Holdout Count Holdout Reduction % Reduction
BB(6) 1161 1104 57 4.91%
BB(7) 18,036,852 17,823,260 213,592 1.18%
BB(4,3) 9,401,447 5,641,006 3,760,441 40.00%
BB(3,4) 12,435,284 12,049,358 385,926 3.10%
BB(2,5) 69 66 3 4.35%
BB(2,6) 545,005 536,112 11,241 1.63%
  • BB(6)
    • Discord user sheep discovered[10][11] a new Cryptid, 1RB1LA_0LC0RC_1LE1RD_1RE1RC_1LF0LA_---1LE (bbch), similar to Space Needle. A classification of Cryptids is now being worked on, where this machine, for example, could belong to a class of Needles (along with Space Needle).
    • BMO 8 was added to the Beaver Math Olympiad: 1RB0LD_0RC1RB_0RD0RA_1LE0RD_1LF---_0LA1LA (bbch)
    • The Turing Machine 1RB1LA_1RC1RE_1LD0RB_1LA0LC_0RF0RD_0RB--- has been informally solved for months now. The formal solution depends on a result in Number Theory, which has not yet been formalised in any formal language, and doing so would be a large project. Therefore the following statement was formalised: assuming the Baker–Wüstholz core bound for linear forms in logarithms over ℚ, the Turing machine never halts. See Github, Axiom minimal version: Discord, The machine's Discord thread: Link. Note that the formal proofs were made with the help of Claude Opus and Aristotle AI.
    • Alistaire simulated a machine to 1e15.
    • Discord user The_Real_Fourious_Banana simulated another TM to 1e15, reducing the 1e14 holdout count to 169 and the 1e15 holdout count to 235.
    • mxdys released a new holdouts list of 1119 machines, the reduction mostly (except for one TM, the other informal holdout) came from new equivalences. This means there is now only 1 holdout considered "informal", which is actually very formal, but depends on Baker's theorem (actually, more restricted than that is enough, see above), and therefore has not been fully formalised.
    • Later, mxdys released a new holdouts list of 1104 machines where more equivalence classes have been merged.
    • Along with the 1 TM simulated by Discord user @furiousbanana (Link to further simulation), the number of machines to simulate to 1e14 & 1e15 is X & Y respectively, due to the recent equivalence reductions. TODO: Add
    • TODO: Add BB6 holdouts decrease graph in 2026: https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1239205785913790465/1492615938824999034
  • BB(7)
    • Further filtering by Andrew Ducharme reduced the number of holdouts from 18,036,852 to 17,823,260.[12] (A 1.18% reduction)
  • BB(4,3):
    • In phase 2 stage 3, Andrew Ducharme reduced the number of holdouts from 9,401,447 to 5,641,006, a 40.00% reduction.[13]
  • BB(3,4):
    • Andrew Ducharme began Phase 3, reducing the holdout count from 12,435,284 to 12,049,358 (a 3.10% reduction) with mxdys's FAR decider.
  • BB(2,5):
  • BB(2,6)
    • Andrew Ducharme reduced the number of holdouts from 545,005 to 536,112 via Enumerate.py, a 1.63% reduction.[16][17][18]
  • BB(2,7)
    • Terry Ligocki enumerated 120K more subtasks, increasing the number of holdouts to 687,123,946. A total of 220K subtasks out of the 1 million subtasks (or 22%) have been enumerated. (see Google Drive) [19][20]