TMBR: October 2025: Difference between revisions
→Holdouts: fixed misplaced holdout counts |
m →Holdouts: Consistent rounding with other TMBR pages |
||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
|1691 | |1691 | ||
|73 | |73 | ||
|4. | |4.3% | ||
|- | |- | ||
|[[BB(7)]] | |[[BB(7)]] | ||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
|22,801,601 | |22,801,601 | ||
|2,396,306 | |2,396,306 | ||
|10. | |10.5% | ||
|- | |- | ||
|[[BB(4,3)]] | |[[BB(4,3)]] | ||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
|460,916,384 | |460,916,384 | ||
|451,514,937 | |451,514,937 | ||
| | |98.0% | ||
|- | |- | ||
|[[BB(3,4)]] | |[[BB(3,4)]] | ||
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
|873,469 | |873,469 | ||
|3384 | |3384 | ||
|0. | |0.4% | ||
|} | |} | ||
* [[BB(6)|BB(6):]] | * [[BB(6)|BB(6):]] | ||
Revision as of 19:39, 28 October 2025
| Prev: September 2025 | This Month in Beaver Research | Next: November 2025 |
This edition of TMBR is in progress and has not yet been released. Please add any notes you think may be relevant (including in the form a of a TODO with a link to any relevant Discord discussion).
TODO: BB(3x3) month

Misc
TODO: Add the mechanical Turing Machine. discord source: https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1362008236118511758/1425889021653160026 and onwards
TODO: Add the method used by @Bricks to measure susceptibility to block-analysis. discord source: https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1239205785913790465/1430227817957953638 also results: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1j00LBxxp9W7uz1wZdMIvDCZ56eReuH0IGO9Z8-yybcQ/edit?usp=sharing

Blog Posts
- 22 Oct 2025. Ben Brubaker. Why Busy Beaver Hunters Fear the Antihydra.
- ? Oct 2025. Katelyn Doucette. Building the Busy Beaver Ladder.
Champions
- BB(4,3):
- Polygon analysed the remaining "potential champions" discovered by Pavel Kropitz in May 2024, discovering that
1RB1RD1LC_2LB1RB1LC_1RZ1LA1LD_0RB2RA2RD(bbch) is the new BB(4,3) champion with a score of over .
- Polygon analysed the remaining "potential champions" discovered by Pavel Kropitz in May 2024, discovering that
Holdouts

| Domain | New Holdout Count | Previous Holdout Count | Holdout Reduction | % Reduction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BB(6) | 1618 | 1691 | 73 | 4.3% |
| BB(7) | 20,405,295 | 22,801,601 | 2,396,306 | 10.5% |
| BB(4,3) | 9,401,447 | 460,916,384 | 451,514,937 | 98.0% |
| BB(3,4) | 15,136,283 | 434,787,751 | 419,651,468 | 96.6% |
| BB(2,6) | 870,085 | 873,469 | 3384 | 0.4% |
- BB(6):
- @mxdys shared a new holdouts list on October 20th, consisting of 1618 machines up to equivalence, or 3067 individual machines. This means 73 newly solved machines, a 4% reduction.
- @Bricks shared a machine which they thought could be susceptible to block-analysis based on a method they call Subtape Saturation Heuristic. Shawn Ligocki's analysis, simulated by @Bricks showed the machine to halt with a sigma score of 4,419,340,317.
- Analysis by Racheline showed a machine to be non-halting.
- BB(7):
- Andrew Ducharme has continued reducing the number of holdouts with Stage 4 of Phase 2. Afterwards, Terry Ligocki ran Stage 5 of Phase 2. Initially, in the beginning of the month there were 22,801,601 holdouts, and 20,405,295 holdouts remain. (10.51% reduction)
- BB(4,3):
- Terry Ligocki has begun Phase 2 of holdout reduction, reducing the number of holdouts from 460,916,384 to 9,401,447. (97.96% reduction)
- BB(3,4):
- XnoobSpeakable and Lúkos are running filters in the domain under Phase 2, reducing the holdout count from 434,787,751 to 15,136,283. (96.6% reduction)
- BB(2,5):
- Peacemaker II gave an informal proof of a machine never halting, making the informal holdout count 67.
- BB(2,6):
- Andrew Ducharme has completed Stage 3 of Phase 2, reducing the number of holdouts from 873,469 to 870,085. (0.39% reduction)
Theory
Piecewise Affine Functions (PAF) were explored as a generalization of the BMO1 rules:
- @Bard proved that 3 dimension PAF are Turing complete: [1]
- @star proved that 2 dimension PAF are Turing complete: [2]
- Shawn Ligocki wrote up a proof sketch that 2-region PAF are Turing complete: https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1239205785913790465/1422772752980639866
- It was discovered that Amir Ben-Amram had already proven that 2-dim and 2-region PAF were Turing complete in 2015.
- BMO1 is a 2-dim, 2-region PAF so this provides some sense for the difficulty of the problem.
Deciders
TODO: Add -d's cpp quick_sim project. Discord source: https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1226543091264126976/1426265937455222794
TODO: Add Katelyn's inductive project. Discord source:https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1369339127652159509/1419016459560161280 https://discord.com/channels/960643023006490684/1095740122139480195/1427714010697961534