User:MrSolis/Playground: Difference between revisions

From BusyBeaverWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
MrSolis (talk | contribs)
Visual touch-ups
MrSolis (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Line 22: Line 22:
Doing so takes us to <math>0^\infty\;\textrm{<D}\;1^{m+4}\;001^{n-1}\;1\;\phantom{}0^\infty</math> in <math>m+3</math> steps, which after one step becomes the configuration <math>0^\infty\;\textrm{<A}\;1^{m+5}\;001^{n-1}\;1\;0^\infty</math>, equal to <math>C(m+5,n-1)</math>. To summarize:
Doing so takes us to <math>0^\infty\;\textrm{<D}\;1^{m+4}\;001^{n-1}\;1\;\phantom{}0^\infty</math> in <math>m+3</math> steps, which after one step becomes the configuration <math>0^\infty\;\textrm{<A}\;1^{m+5}\;001^{n-1}\;1\;0^\infty</math>, equal to <math>C(m+5,n-1)</math>. To summarize:
<math display="block">\begin{array}{|c|}\hline C(m,n)\xrightarrow{2m+8}C(m+5,n-1)\text{ if }n\ge 1.\\\hline\end{array}</math>
<math display="block">\begin{array}{|c|}\hline C(m,n)\xrightarrow{2m+8}C(m+5,n-1)\text{ if }n\ge 1.\\\hline\end{array}</math>
We have <math>g(x)=C(x-1,0)</math>. As a result, if <math>x\equiv0\ (\operatorname{mod}3)</math>, we then get <math display="inline">C\Big(0,\frac{1}{3}x+1\Big)</math> and the above rule is applied until we reach <math display="inline">C\Big(\frac{5}{3}x+5,0\Big)</math>, equal to <math display="inline">g\Big(\frac{5}{3}x+6\Big)</math>, in <math>\sum_{i=0}^{x/3}(2\times 5i+8)=\textstyle\frac{5}{9}x^2+\frac{13}{3}x+8</math> steps for a total of <math display="inline">\frac{5}{9}x^2+\frac{19}{3}+15</math> steps from <math>g(x)</math> (with <math>g(0)</math> we see the impossible configuration <math>C(-1,0)</math>, but it reaches <math>g(6)</math> in 15 steps regardless). However, if <math>x\equiv1\ (\operatorname{mod}3)</math>, we then get <math display="inline">C\Big(3,\frac{x+2}{3}\Big)</math> which reaches <math display="inline">C\Big(3+\frac{5(x+2)}{3},0\Big)</math>, equal to <math display="inline">g\Big(\frac{5x+22}{3}\Big)</math>, in <math display="inline">\frac{5}{9}x^2+\frac{47}{9}x+\frac{74}{9}</math> steps (<math display="inline">\frac{5}{9}x^2+\frac{65}{9}x+\frac{173}{9}</math> steps total).
We have <math>g(x)=C(x-1,0)</math>. As a result, if <math>x\equiv0\ (\operatorname{mod}3)</math>, we then get <math display="inline">C\Big(0,\frac{1}{3}x+1\Big)</math> and the above rule is applied until we reach <math display="inline">C\Big(\frac{5}{3}x+5,0\Big)</math>, equal to <math display="inline">g\Big(\frac{5}{3}x+6\Big)</math>, in <math>\sum_{i=0}^{x/3}(2\times 5i+8)=\textstyle\frac{5}{9}x^2+\frac{13}{3}x+8</math> steps for a total of <math display="inline">\frac{5}{9}x^2+\frac{19}{3}x+15</math> steps from <math>g(x)</math> (with <math>g(0)</math> we see the impossible configuration <math>C(-1,0)</math>, but it reaches <math>g(6)</math> in 15 steps regardless). However, if <math>x\equiv1\ (\operatorname{mod}3)</math>, we then get <math display="inline">C\Big(3,\frac{x+2}{3}\Big)</math> which reaches <math display="inline">C\Big(3+\frac{5(x+2)}{3},0\Big)</math>, equal to <math display="inline">g\Big(\frac{5x+22}{3}\Big)</math>, in <math display="inline">\frac{5}{9}x^2+\frac{47}{9}x+\frac{74}{9}</math> steps (<math display="inline">\frac{5}{9}x^2+\frac{65}{9}x+\frac{173}{9}</math> steps total).


The information above can be summarized as<ref>Aaronson, S. (2020). The Busy Beaver Frontier. Page 10-11. https://www.scottaaronson.com/papers/bb.pdf</ref>
The information above can be summarized as<ref>Aaronson, S. (2020). The Busy Beaver Frontier. Page 10-11. https://www.scottaaronson.com/papers/bb.pdf</ref>
Line 28: Line 28:
Substituting <math>x\leftarrow 3x</math>, <math>x\leftarrow 3x+1</math>, and <math>x\leftarrow 3x+2</math> to each of these cases respectively gives us our final result.
Substituting <math>x\leftarrow 3x</math>, <math>x\leftarrow 3x+1</math>, and <math>x\leftarrow 3x+2</math> to each of these cases respectively gives us our final result.
== Trajectory ==
== Trajectory ==
The initial blank tape represents <math>g(0)</math>, and the rules are iterated 15 times before halting:
The initial blank tape represents <math>g(0)</math>, and the [[Collatz-like]] rules are iterated 15 times before halting:
<math display="block">\begin{array}{|lllllllllll|}\hline g(0)&\xrightarrow{15} &g(6)&\xrightarrow{73} &g(16)&\xrightarrow{277}\\
<math display="block">\begin{array}{|lllllllllll|}\hline g(0)&\xrightarrow{15} &g(6)&\xrightarrow{73} &g(16)&\xrightarrow{277}\\
g(34)&\xrightarrow{907}&g(64)&\xrightarrow{2757}&g(114)&\xrightarrow{7957}\\
g(34)&\xrightarrow{907}&g(64)&\xrightarrow{2757}&g(114)&\xrightarrow{7957}\\

Revision as of 19:38, 2 February 2025

5-state busy beaver winner (WIP Revamp)

The 5-state busy beaver (BB(5)) winner is 1RB1LC_1RC1RB_1RD0LE_1LA1LD_1RZ0LA (bbch). Discovered by Heiner Marxen and Jürgen Buntrock in 1989[1], this machine proved that BB⁡(5)≥47176870 and Σ(5)≥4098 at the time.

Analysis

Rules

Let g(x):=0∞<A1x0∞. Then[2], g(3x)→5x2+19x+15g(5x+6),g(3x+1)→5x2+25x+27g(5x+9),g(3x+2)→6x+120∞1Z>01001x+110∞.

Proof

Consider the configuration C(m,n):=0∞<A1m001n10∞. After one step this configuration becomes 0∞1B>1m001n10∞. We note the following shift rule: B>1a→a1aB> Using this shift rule, we get 0∞1m+1B>001n10∞ after m steps. If n=0, then we get 0∞1m+4<A10∞ four steps later. Another shift rule is needed here: 13a<A→3a<A001a In this instance, ⌊m+43⌋ is substituted for a, which creates three different scenarios depending on the value of m modulo 3. They are as follows:

  1. If m+4≡0 (mod⁡3), then in m+4 steps we arrive at 0∞<A001(m+4)/310∞, which is the same configuration as C(0,m+43).
  2. If m+4≡1 (mod⁡3), then in m+3 steps we arrive at 0∞1<A001(m+3)/310∞, which is five steps becomes 0∞<A111001(m+3)/310∞, equal to C(3,m+33).
  3. If m+4≡2 (mod⁡3), then in m+2 steps we arrive at 0∞11<A001(m+2)/310∞, which in three steps halts with the configuration 0∞1Z>01001(m+2)/310∞, for a total of 2m+10 steps from C(m,0).

Returning to 0∞1m+1B>001n10∞, if n≥1, then in three steps it changes into 0∞1m+3<D1001n−110∞. Here we can make use of one more shift rule: 1a<D→a<D1a Doing so takes us to 0∞<D1m+4001n−110∞ in m+3 steps, which after one step becomes the configuration 0∞<A1m+5001n−110∞, equal to C(m+5,n−1). To summarize: C(m,n)→2m+8C(m+5,n−1) if n≥1. We have g(x)=C(x−1,0). As a result, if x≡0 (mod⁡3), we then get C(0,13x+1) and the above rule is applied until we reach C(53x+5,0), equal to g(53x+6), in ∑i=0x/3(2×5i+8)=59x2+133x+8 steps for a total of 59x2+193x+15 steps from g(x) (with g(0) we see the impossible configuration C(−1,0), but it reaches g(6) in 15 steps regardless). However, if x≡1 (mod⁡3), we then get C(3,x+23) which reaches C(3+5(x+2)3,0), equal to g(5x+223), in 59x2+479x+749 steps (59x2+659x+1739 steps total).

The information above can be summarized as[3] g(x)→{g(53x+6)if x≡0(mod3)g(5x+223)if x≡1(mod3)0∞1Z>01001(x+1)/310∞if x≡2(mod3) Substituting x←3x, x←3x+1, and x←3x+2 to each of these cases respectively gives us our final result.

Trajectory

The initial blank tape represents g(0), and the Collatz-like rules are iterated 15 times before halting: g(0)→15g(6)→73g(16)→277g(34)→907g(64)→2757g(114)→7957g(196)→22777g(334)→64407g(564)→180307g(946)→504027g(1584)→1403967g(2646)→3906393g(4416)→10861903g(7366)→30196527g(12284)→245760∞1Z>01001409510∞

References

  1. ↑ H. Marxen and J. Buntrock. Attacking the Busy Beaver 5. Bulletin of the EATCS, 40, pages 247-251, February 1990. https://turbotm.de/~heiner/BB/mabu90.html
  2. ↑ Pascal Michel. Behavior of busy beavers.https://bbchallenge.org/~pascal.michel/beh#tm52a
  3. ↑ Aaronson, S. (2020). The Busy Beaver Frontier. Page 10-11. https://www.scottaaronson.com/papers/bb.pdf