Probvious: Difference between revisions

From BusyBeaverWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (unmath)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Probvious''' is a portmanteau of "probabilistically obvious" coined by John Conway in "On Unsettleable Arithmetical Problems".<ref>John Conway. "On Unsettleable Arithmetical Problems". 2017. https://doi.org/10.4169/amer.math.monthly.120.03.192</ref>
"'''Probvious'''" (a portmanteau of the words ''probabilistic'' and ''obvious'') is an adjective used to express a high degree of confidence about a mathematical property or statement that is not known to be true. It was introduced by John Conway in an article discussing potentially unproveable statements.<ref>John Conway. "On Unsettleable Arithmetical Problems". 2017. https://doi.org/10.4169/amer.math.monthly.120.03.192</ref> The term has been used by [https://www.bbchallenge.org bbchallenge] contributors to describe the solutions to halting problems for [[Cryptids]] such as [[Bigfoot]] and [[Hydra]].
 
==Usage==
<blockquote>
[[File:ProbviousExcerpt.png|right|400px|thumb|The excerpt from the article by John Conway where "probvious" is introduced.]]
However, the numbers in both of these cycles have been followed in each direction until they get larger than 10<sup>400</sup> and it’s obvious that they will never again descend below 100. We need a name for this kind of obviousness: I suggest probvious, abbreviating “probabilistically obvious.
The word appears in Conway's article a few times as a way of forming conjectures about a [[Collatz-like]] function that had already been investigated in the past.<ref>Atkin, A. O. L. "Problem 63-13." <i>SIAM Review</i> 8, no. 2 (1966): 234–36. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2028281</ref><ref>Guy, Richard K. "Don’t Try to Solve These Problems!" <i>The American Mathematical Monthly</i> 90, no. 1 (1983): 35–41. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2975688</ref> This function, denoted <math>\mu(n)</math>, is defined as:
</blockquote>
<math display="block">\begin{array}{lll}\mu(2n)&=&3n\\ \mu(4n+1)&=&3n+1\\ \mu(4n+3)&=&3n+2\end{array}\qquad\Rightarrow\qquad\begin{array}{lll}\mu^{-1}(3n)&=&2n\\ \mu^{-1}(3n+1)&=&4n+1\\ \mu^{-1}(3n+2)&=&4n+3\end{array}</math>
 
Conway first uses "probvious" to describe the idea that the sequences of iterates <math>(\cdots,8,\mu(8),\mu^2(8),\cdots)</math> and <math>(\cdots,14,\mu(14),\mu^2(14),\cdots)</math> diverge to infinity. Likewise, there exist [[Turing machines]] for which determining whether they halt requires solving a mathematical problem believed to be difficult, oftentimes a [[Collatz-like]] problem, but using probabilistic approximations of their functions suggests a clear solution. For example, Bigfoot, Hydra, and others function like biased random walks and treating them as such leads to the conclusion that they are probviously nonhalting. Similarly, machines such as [[Lucy's Moonlight]], [[Mother of Giants]], and others function like very slow-running random number generators that halt once a specific value is reached, which probviously happens with enough attempts.
Probviousness is subjective, there is no precise mathematical definition of what is or is not probvious. However, it is a useful concept when thinking about [[Collatz-like]] problems where we generally do not think that we are anywhere near being able to solve them, but by observing the behavior as if it were probabilistically random, there is an clear solution. This is especially useful for [[Cryptids]] where we can have Cryptids which probviously never halt (like [[Bigfoot]], [[Hydra]] and [[Antihydra]]) and ones that probviously halt (like [[Mother of Giants]]).
 
== References ==
== References ==
<references />
<references />

Revision as of 22:45, 7 March 2025

"Probvious" (a portmanteau of the words probabilistic and obvious) is an adjective used to express a high degree of confidence about a mathematical property or statement that is not known to be true. It was introduced by John Conway in an article discussing potentially unproveable statements.[1] The term has been used by bbchallenge contributors to describe the solutions to halting problems for Cryptids such as Bigfoot and Hydra.

Usage

The excerpt from the article by John Conway where "probvious" is introduced.

The word appears in Conway's article a few times as a way of forming conjectures about a Collatz-like function that had already been investigated in the past.[2][3] This function, denoted , is defined as:

Conway first uses "probvious" to describe the idea that the sequences of iterates and diverge to infinity. Likewise, there exist Turing machines for which determining whether they halt requires solving a mathematical problem believed to be difficult, oftentimes a Collatz-like problem, but using probabilistic approximations of their functions suggests a clear solution. For example, Bigfoot, Hydra, and others function like biased random walks and treating them as such leads to the conclusion that they are probviously nonhalting. Similarly, machines such as Lucy's Moonlight, Mother of Giants, and others function like very slow-running random number generators that halt once a specific value is reached, which probviously happens with enough attempts.

References

  1. John Conway. "On Unsettleable Arithmetical Problems". 2017. https://doi.org/10.4169/amer.math.monthly.120.03.192
  2. Atkin, A. O. L. "Problem 63-13." SIAM Review 8, no. 2 (1966): 234–36. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2028281
  3. Guy, Richard K. "Don’t Try to Solve These Problems!" The American Mathematical Monthly 90, no. 1 (1983): 35–41. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2975688